Delaney V, Ling B N, Campbell W G, Bourke J E, Fekete P S, O'Brien D P, Taylor A T, Whelchel J D
Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.
Nephron. 1993;63(3):263-72. doi: 10.1159/000187208.
150 episodes of allograft dysfunction in 128 renal transplant recipients, 77 due to acute rejection, 32 secondary to acute-on-chronic rejection, 33 due to either prerenal factors, acute tubular necrosis, or ciclosporin A nephrotoxicity, and 8 secondary to multiple causes, were evaluated by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), Doppler ultrasound (DUS), and radionuclide scintigraphy (RS), each performed within a 24-hour period and prior to any specific therapeutic intervention. Tests were interpreted by appropriate specialists in a large transplant center without access to clinical information. The final diagnosis was based primarily upon response to therapeutic maneuvers with histological (core biopsy) confirmation in 123 episodes. RS was the most sensitive (70%) test for the diagnosis of acute rejection during the early posttransplant period, exceeding both FNAB (52%) and DUS (43%). The predictive accuracy of either FNAB, DUS, RS, or core biopsy in the detection of a steroid-responsive component to acute rejection when superimposed upon chronic rejection was low at approximately 50%. When the underlying cause of renal dysfunction was either prerenal, acute tubular necrosis, or ciclosporin A nephrotoxicity, FNAB, DUS, and RS each gave an erroneous diagnosis of acute rejection in about 50% of the episodes. Cost analysis revealed that core biopsy was the most expensive test, but only 9% more than RS, with FNAB the least costly. In conclusion, the lack of ideal sensitivity and specificity combined with the expense of present-day FNAB, DUS, RS, and core biopsy in the diagnosis of a therapeutically reversible component to acute-on-chronic rejection and of FNAB, DUS, and RS in the diagnosis of acute rejection during the early posttransplant period should prompt research into ways to improve their diagnostic yield or alternate modalities.
对128例肾移植受者的150次移植肾失功情况进行了评估,其中77次是由于急性排斥反应,32次继发于慢性移植物功能障碍基础上的急性排斥反应,33次是由于肾前性因素、急性肾小管坏死或环孢素A肾毒性,8次是多种原因所致。通过细针穿刺活检(FNAB)、多普勒超声(DUS)和放射性核素闪烁扫描(RS)进行评估,每项检查均在24小时内且在任何特异性治疗干预之前进行。在一个大型移植中心,由专业人员解读检查结果,且不了解临床信息。最终诊断主要基于对治疗措施的反应,并经组织学(芯针活检)证实,共123次。RS是移植后早期诊断急性排斥反应最敏感的检查(70%),超过FNAB(52%)和DUS(43%)。当急性排斥反应叠加在慢性排斥反应之上时,FNAB、DUS、RS或芯针活检检测急性排斥反应中对类固醇有反应成分的预测准确性较低,约为50%。当肾功能障碍的潜在原因是肾前性、急性肾小管坏死或环孢素A肾毒性时,FNAB、DUS和RS在约50%的病例中均错误诊断为急性排斥反应。成本分析显示,芯针活检是最昂贵的检查,但仅比RS贵9%,FNAB成本最低。总之,目前的FNAB、DUS、RS和芯针活检在诊断慢性移植物功能障碍基础上的急性排斥反应中具有治疗可逆性成分时,缺乏理想的敏感性和特异性,且费用较高;在移植后早期诊断急性排斥反应时,FNAB、DUS和RS也是如此。这应促使人们研究提高其诊断率的方法或替代检查手段。