Becker B B
Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, Calif.
Ophthalmic Surg. 1993 Feb;24(2):91-3.
Using the Olympus PF-22 angioscope to examine the inferior meatus during secondary dye testing of the lacrimal system, I evaluated the efficacy of the secondary dye test to localize partial or functional obstruction of the upper or lower lacrimal excretory system. Secondary dye testing was positive (dye present in the nose) in 12 of 13 lacrimal systems (92%) with functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction, in 7 of 8 (89%) with involutional ectropion, and in 4 of 5 (80%) with facial nerve palsy. Secondary dye testing was negative in the 1 lacrimal system with canalicular stenosis and in 5 of the 6 (83%) with punctal stenosis. Secondary dye testing is helpful in differentiating punctal or canalicular stenosis from functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction; however, it cannot help differentiate ectropion or facial nerve palsy from functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
在泪道系统二次染料试验期间,使用奥林巴斯PF - 22血管镜检查下鼻道,我评估了二次染料试验在定位上、下泪道排泄系统部分或功能性阻塞方面的有效性。在13个泪道系统中有12个(92%)存在功能性鼻泪管阻塞、8个中有7个(89%)存在退行性睑外翻、5个中有4个(80%)存在面神经麻痹的情况下,二次染料试验呈阳性(染料出现在鼻腔)。在1个存在泪小管狭窄的泪道系统以及6个中有5个(83%)存在泪点狭窄的情况下,二次染料试验呈阴性。二次染料试验有助于区分泪点或泪小管狭窄与功能性鼻泪管阻塞;然而,它无法区分睑外翻或面神经麻痹与功能性鼻泪管阻塞。