Buxton A E, Kleiman R B, Kindwall K E, Josephson M E
Clinical Electrophysiology Laboratory, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Am J Cardiol. 1993 Mar 15;71(8):695-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)91012-7.
Programmed stimulation in patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and coronary artery disease (CAD) induces sustained VT in 30 to 50% of patients. The presence of inducible, sustained VT identifies patients at high risk for sudden death. This study sought to determine whether patients with nonsustained VT who have inducible, sustained VT would have differences of left ventricular endocardial activation and conduction compared with those of patients without inducible, sustained VT. Thirty-six patients with CAD referred for evaluation of nonsustained VT underwent programmed ventricular stimulation and catheter mapping of left ventricular endocardial activation. Using previously validated methods, electrograms were classified as normal, abnormal or fractionated based on measurement of local electrogram duration and amplitude. Programmed stimulation induced sustained, uniform VT in 16 of 36 patients (44%). Patients with inducible, sustained, uniform VT had significantly more sites with abnormal (48%) and fractionated (5.5%) electrograms than did those without inducible VT (35% abnormal and 0.4% fractionated; p = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). Patients with inducible VT had a mean of 15% of mapped sites displaying late electrograms versus only 3% in those without inducible VT (p < 0.01). The duration of the longest local electrogram in patients with inducible, sustained, uniform VT was 128 ms compared with 100 ms in those without inducible VT (p < 0.001). Thus, patients with CAD presenting with nonsustained VT who have inducible, sustained, uniform VT have significantly greater degrees of local conduction slowing and delayed activation than do those without inducible, sustained, uniform VT. These observations support reentry as the mechanism of the induced arrhythmias in these patients.
对于非持续性室性心动过速(VT)和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者,程控刺激可使30%至50%的患者诱发持续性VT。可诱发性持续性VT的存在可识别出猝死高危患者。本研究旨在确定有可诱发性持续性VT的非持续性VT患者与无可诱发性持续性VT的患者相比,左心室心内膜激活和传导是否存在差异。36例因非持续性VT接受评估的CAD患者接受了程控心室刺激和左心室心内膜激活的导管标测。使用先前验证的方法,根据局部电图持续时间和幅度的测量,将电图分为正常、异常或碎裂。程控刺激在36例患者中的16例(44%)诱发了持续性、均一性VT。有可诱发性持续性均一性VT的患者与无可诱发性VT的患者相比,有更多部位的电图异常(48%)和碎裂(5.5%)(分别为35%异常和0.4%碎裂;p = 0.05和0.01)。有可诱发性VT的患者平均有15%的标测部位显示延迟电图,而无可诱发性VT的患者仅为3%(p < 0.01)。有可诱发性持续性均一性VT的患者最长局部电图持续时间为128 ms,而无可诱发性VT的患者为100 ms(p < 0.001)。因此,有可诱发性持续性均一性VT的CAD伴非持续性VT患者比无可诱发性持续性均一性VT的患者有更明显的局部传导减慢和激活延迟。这些观察结果支持折返是这些患者诱发心律失常的机制。