Cassidy D M, Vassallo J A, Miller J M, Poll D S, Buxton A E, Marchlinski F E, Josephson M E
Circulation. 1986 Apr;73(4):645-52. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.73.4.645.
Catheter mapping during sinus rhythm was performed in 132 patients with coronary artery disease and 26 patients with congestive noncoronary cardiomyopathy. Each of the patients had a clinical history of one of the following: no ventricular arrhythmia, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, cardiac arrest, or sustained ventricular tachycardia. The characteristics of the endocardial electrogram and other measured indexes of slow endocardial conduction were compared between patients with different types of disease and in different arrhythmia groups to determine if differences existed. The cardiomyopathic group had a higher percent of normal endocardial electrograms than the coronary artery disease group, with no evidence of slow endocardial conduction. The sustained ventricular tachycardia group exhibited a greater percent of abnormal endocardial electrograms and more evidence of slow endocardial conduction, distinguishing this group from the three other arrhythmia groups. We conclude the following: The underlying electrophysiologic substrate varies in patients with different ventricular arrhythmias. It is therefore inappropriate to analyze all patients with ventricular arrhythmias as a single group. Patients with congestive noncoronary cardiomyopathy, regardless of the type of their arrhythmia, have a relatively normal endocardium. Those patients with serious ventricular arrhythmias should not be considered candidates for surgery directed at removing abnormal endocardium.
对132例冠心病患者和26例充血性非冠心病心肌病患者在窦性心律时进行导管标测。每位患者都有以下临床病史之一:无室性心律失常、非持续性室性心动过速、心脏骤停或持续性室性心动过速。比较不同疾病类型患者以及不同心律失常组内心电图特征和其他测量的缓慢心内膜传导指标,以确定是否存在差异。心肌病组正常心内膜电图的百分比高于冠心病组,且无心内膜缓慢传导的证据。持续性室性心动过速组异常心内膜电图的百分比更高,心内膜缓慢传导的证据更多,这使其与其他三个心律失常组区分开来。我们得出以下结论:不同室性心律失常患者的潜在电生理基质不同。因此,将所有室性心律失常患者作为一个单一群体进行分析是不合适的。充血性非冠心病心肌病患者,无论其心律失常类型如何,心内膜相对正常。那些有严重室性心律失常的患者不应被视为针对去除异常心内膜的手术候选者。