• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将吸烟死亡人数减半的政策。

Policies to halve smoking deaths.

作者信息

Townsend J

机构信息

MRC Epidemiology and Medical Care Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Medical College of St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Addiction. 1993 Jan;88(1):37-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02762.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02762.x
PMID:8448515
Abstract

Britain still has amongst the highest mortality rates in the world for all the major smoking diseases. A third of all adults smoke cigarettes regularly and smoking causes one third of UK deaths in middle age. This paper discusses factors related to changes in smoking levels and concludes that without the intervention of government policies, smoking prevalence and the amount smoked per smoker is likely to rise, particularly for young people. Measures to reduce smoking are surveyed and estimates made of the maximum likely effects from health education, advertising control, general practitioner smoking cessation advice and public and work place policies. A pricing policy is suggested which, with the other policies could reduce cigarette consumption by a half so that only one in five adults smoke by the year 2000. Predictions are made of the effect of this policy package on lives and life years saved. Within twenty five years there would be 50,000 fewer deaths from smoking and half a million life years saved annually. This would rise to two thirds of a million within forty years. Deaths from lung cancer would fall by 38%. The quality of these life years saved would tend to the average for their age.

摘要

在所有主要的吸烟相关疾病方面,英国的死亡率仍位居世界前列。三分之一的成年人经常吸烟,吸烟导致英国三分之一的中年人死亡。本文讨论了与吸烟水平变化相关的因素,并得出结论:如果没有政府政策的干预,吸烟率以及每个吸烟者的吸烟量可能会上升,尤其是在年轻人当中。文中调查了减少吸烟的措施,并对健康教育、广告管控、全科医生戒烟建议以及公共和工作场所政策可能产生的最大效果进行了估算。建议实施一项定价政策,该政策与其他政策一起,可使香烟消费量减少一半,从而到2000年时只有五分之一的成年人吸烟。文中预测了这一政策组合对挽救生命和生命年数的影响。在25年内,吸烟导致的死亡人数将减少5万,每年可挽救50万个生命年。到40年内,这一数字将增至60万。肺癌死亡人数将下降38%。这些被挽救的生命年的质量将趋向于其年龄段的平均水平。

相似文献

1
Policies to halve smoking deaths.将吸烟死亡人数减半的政策。
Addiction. 1993 Jan;88(1):37-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02762.x.
2
The effect of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. Findings from the Netherlands SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Simulation Model.烟草控制政策对吸烟流行率和归因于吸烟的死亡人数的影响。来自荷兰 SimSmoke 烟草控制政策模拟模型的研究结果。
Addiction. 2012 Feb;107(2):407-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03642.x. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
3
The Brazil SimSmoke policy simulation model: the effect of strong tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in a middle income nation.巴西 SimSmoke 政策模拟模型:在中等收入国家实施强有力的烟草控制政策对吸烟流行率和归因于吸烟的死亡人数的影响。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001336. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
4
The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence: results from the Michigan SimSmoke tobacco policy simulation model.公共政策在降低吸烟流行率方面的作用:来自密歇根州SimSmoke烟草政策模拟模型的结果。
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 May;27(5):615-25. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0735-4. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
5
The role of tobacco control policies in reducing smoking and deaths in a middle income nation: results from the Thailand SimSmoke simulation model.烟草控制政策在中等收入国家减少吸烟及死亡方面的作用:泰国SimSmoke模拟模型的结果
Tob Control. 2008 Feb;17(1):53-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.022319.
6
Mexico SimSmoke: how changes in tobacco control policies would impact smoking prevalence and smoking attributable deaths in Mexico.墨西哥模拟吸烟情况:烟草控制政策的变化将如何影响墨西哥的吸烟率和吸烟所致死亡人数。
Glob Public Health. 2017 Jul;12(7):830-845. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2015.1123749. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
7
New Zealand's tobacco control programme 1985-1998.新西兰1985 - 1998年的烟草控制计划。
Tob Control. 2000 Jun;9(2):155-62. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.2.155.
8
Snuffing out cigarette sales and the smoking deaths epidemic.杜绝香烟销售与吸烟致死的流行趋势。
N Z Med J. 2007 Jun 15;120(1256):U2587.
9
A comparison of smoking patterns in the People's Republic of China with the United States. An impending health catastrophe in the middle kingdom.中华人民共和国与美国吸烟模式的比较。中国即将面临的健康灾难。
JAMA. 1990 Sep 26;264(12):1575-9.
10
The health impact of cigarette smoking in Taiwan.吸烟对台湾地区健康的影响。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 1994;7(4):206-13. doi: 10.1177/101053959400700402.

引用本文的文献

1
Health economists, tobacco control and international development: On the economisation of global health beyond neoliberal structural adjustment policies.健康经济学家、烟草控制与国际发展:论新自由主义结构调整政策之外的全球健康经济化
Biosocieties. 2013 Jun;8(2):205-228. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2013.3.
2
Scaling up chronic disease prevention interventions in lower- and middle-income countries.在中低收入国家扩大慢性病预防干预措施。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:317-35. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114402. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
3
Avoidable global cancer deaths and total deaths from smoking.
可避免的全球癌症死亡人数及吸烟导致的总死亡人数。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Sep;9(9):655-64. doi: 10.1038/nrc2703. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
4
The white paper on public health.关于公共卫生的白皮书。
BMJ. 2004 Nov 27;329(7477):1247-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7477.1247.
5
Support for tobacco control policies: how congruent are the attitudes of legislators and the public?对烟草控制政策的支持:立法者与公众的态度有多大一致性?
Can J Public Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;94(1):36-40. doi: 10.1007/BF03405050.
6
A framework for the evidence base to support Health Impact Assessment.支持健康影响评估的证据基础框架。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Feb;56(2):132-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.2.132.
7
The economics of global tobacco control.全球烟草控制的经济学
BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):358-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.358.
8
Exploring a fiscal food policy: the case of diet and ischaemic heart disease.探索财政食品政策:以饮食与缺血性心脏病为例。
BMJ. 2000 Jan 29;320(7230):301-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7230.301.