Burman B, Margolin G, John R S
School of Social Welfare, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-1452.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Feb;61(1):28-39. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.1.28.
Sequential analysis was used to compare the conflictual marital interactions of physically aggressive (PA, n = 17), verbally aggressive (VA, n = 15), withdrawing (WI, n = 18), and nondistressed, low-conflict (ND, n = 15) couples to describe behavior patterns characteristic of couples who report different marital conflict styles. Videotapes of couples enacting typical conflicts in their own homes were coded with a system designed to capture the affective aspects of communication. PA couples were characterized by the reciprocity of hostile affect and by rigid, highly contingent behavior patterns that were both stronger and longer lasting than those of other conflictual, but nonviolent, couples. In a limited way, ND couples demonstrated some of the same negative behavior patterns as the conflictual couples, but they were able to exit these negative interaction cycles quickly, which underscores the importance of further research into the de-escalation of conflict.
采用序列分析方法,比较身体攻击型(PA,n = 17)、言语攻击型(VA,n = 15)、退缩型(WI,n = 18)以及无困扰、低冲突型(ND,n = 15)夫妻之间冲突性的婚姻互动,以描述报告不同婚姻冲突风格的夫妻所特有的行为模式。夫妻在自家演绎典型冲突的录像带,采用一种旨在捕捉沟通情感方面的系统进行编码。PA夫妻的特点是敌对情绪的相互性以及刻板、高度依赖情境的行为模式,这些模式比其他冲突但非暴力的夫妻更为强烈且持续时间更长。在一定程度上,ND夫妻表现出一些与冲突夫妻相同的消极行为模式,但他们能够迅速脱离这些消极互动循环,这凸显了进一步研究冲突缓和的重要性。