Suppr超能文献

狂犬病与博尔纳病。两种神经病毒病原体的比较性发病机制研究。

Rabies and borna disease. A comparative pathogenetic study of two neurovirulent agents.

作者信息

Gosztonyi G, Dietzschold B, Kao M, Rupprecht C E, Ludwig H, Koprowski H

机构信息

Institutes of Neuropathology and Virology, Freie Universität Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Lab Invest. 1993 Mar;68(3):285-95.

PMID:8450648
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rabies and Borna disease viruses have been regarded as classical neurotropic agents. Many pathogenetic similarities are shared by these two negative strand RNA viruses. In view of recently gained data on the virology and pathology of these two diseases, and up-to-date comparative pathogenetic study seems to be justified.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This study is based on a survey of experimental and natural infections of laboratory animals and natural hosts. The morphologic damage to the nervous system has been evaluated by light and electron microscopy, with special emphasis on immunocytochemical methods.

RESULTS

This comparative study disclosed that both viruses are transported inside axons, pass synapses and propagate along neuronal networks. At the sites of synaptic transfer, full virus particles can never be detected in the early phase of rabies virus infection; in Borna disease virus (BDV) infection, virus particles cannot be found in any phase of disease progression. Thus, a major difference exists between the two agents insofar as rabies virus is morphologically well characterized, whereas BDV has never been visualized in tissue sections. Furthermore, rabies virus infects only neurons, whereas BDV also infects glial cells. The host range and the scale of infection of extraneural tissues by both agents is extremely similar.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations allow us to postulate that the synaptic transfer of both viruses likely ensures in the form of bare nucleocapsids (ribonucleoprotein-transcriptase complexes). While in the later phases of replication complete rabies virions are regularly assembled, BDV propagates within the central nervous system in an incomplete form, so that it remains morphologically imperceptible. Thus, BDV may appear in a complete, enveloped form only when exiting the host organism. The dissemination patterns of the two agents may be influenced by specific affinities to neurotransmitter receptor sites. It remains unresolved, why BDV readily infects non-neuronal central nervous system cells, while rabies virus remains restricted to neuronal elements.

摘要

背景

狂犬病病毒和博尔纳病病毒一直被视为典型的嗜神经病原体。这两种负链RNA病毒有许多致病相似性。鉴于最近获得的关于这两种疾病的病毒学和病理学数据,进行最新的比较致病研究似乎是合理的。

实验设计

本研究基于对实验动物和自然宿主的实验性和自然感染的调查。通过光学显微镜和电子显微镜评估神经系统的形态损伤,特别强调免疫细胞化学方法。

结果

这项比较研究表明,两种病毒都在轴突内运输,通过突触并沿神经网络传播。在突触传递部位,狂犬病病毒感染早期从未检测到完整的病毒颗粒;在博尔纳病病毒(BDV)感染中,在疾病进展的任何阶段都未发现病毒颗粒。因此,这两种病原体之间存在一个主要差异,即狂犬病病毒在形态上有很好的特征描述,而BDV从未在组织切片中被观察到。此外,狂犬病病毒只感染神经元,而BDV也感染神经胶质细胞。两种病原体的宿主范围和神经外组织的感染规模极其相似。

结论

这些观察结果使我们能够推测,两种病毒的突触传递可能以裸露的核衣壳(核糖核蛋白 - 转录酶复合物)形式确保。虽然在复制后期会定期组装完整的狂犬病病毒粒子,但BDV以不完整的形式在中枢神经系统内传播,因此在形态上难以察觉。因此,BDV可能仅在离开宿主生物体时才以完整的、有包膜的形式出现。两种病原体的传播模式可能受对神经递质受体位点的特定亲和力影响。BDV容易感染非神经元中枢神经系统细胞,而狂犬病病毒仅限于神经元成分,原因仍未解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验