Beattie R C, Forrester P W, Ruby B K
J Am Audiol Soc. 1977 Jan-Feb;2(4):159-62.
This study investigated the reliability of the Tillman-Olsen procedure for establishing the spondee threshold (ST). Monitored live voice (MLV) and the Auditec of St. Louis recordings of the Central Institute for the Deaf spondees were used as stimuli. Ninety-five percent of 96 normal hearing subjects had test-retest STs within 5 dB and no subject varied more than 8 dB. Although these results represent good short term reliability for the Tillman-Olsen procedure, repeatability is no better than that produced by other procedures. Thresholds obtained by MLV were as reliable as the recorded spondees. It was concluded that recorded spondees offer no advantages over MLV testing for the experienced clinician. The recorded presentation gave STs that are very close to the normative value for speech specified by ANSl-1969. Live voice testing showed STs 4.7 dB better than when the Auditec recordings were used.
本研究调查了用于确定扬扬格阈值（ST）的蒂尔曼 - 奥尔森程序的可靠性。监测的现场语音（MLV）和圣路易斯聋人中央研究所扬扬格词的Auditec录音被用作刺激物。96名听力正常的受试者中有95%的重测ST在5分贝以内，且没有受试者的变化超过8分贝。虽然这些结果表明蒂尔曼 - 奥尔森程序具有良好的短期可靠性，但重复性并不比其他程序更好。通过MLV获得的阈值与录制的扬扬格词一样可靠。结论是，对于有经验的临床医生来说，录制的扬扬格词在MLV测试方面没有优势。录制的呈现方式给出的ST非常接近ANSl - 1969规定的语音规范值。现场语音测试显示ST比使用Auditec录音时好4.7分贝。
