Wilson R H, Coley K E, Haenel J L, Browning K M
J Am Audiol Soc. 1976 Mar-Apr;1(5):221-8.
A commercially available recording of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 (N.U. No. 6) produced by Auditec of St. Louis was evaluated in a series of four studies. Interlist equivalence of this version was initially investigated, and then normative intelligibility functions were developed using listerners with normal hearing. Intelligibility functions for the original version of N.U. No. 6. prepared by Northwestern University, were then derived, concurrently with functions of the Auditec version, using (1) a group of listeners with normal hearing; and (2) a group with sensorineural hearing loss. The results demonstrated good interlist equivalence for the Auditec version of N.U. No. 6. The comparative intelligibility functions for the Auditec and Northwestern versions of N.U. No 6 furthermore indicated a difference between the two recordings, but it was concluded that for clinical purposes the two versions may be considered equivalent.
对圣路易斯的Auditec公司制作的西北大学听觉测试第6号（NU-6）的市售录音进行了四项系列研究。最初研究了该版本的列表间等效性，然后使用听力正常的听众开发了标准可懂度函数。随后，使用（1）一组听力正常的听众和（2）一组感音神经性听力损失的听众，推导出西北大学编制的原始版本NU-6的可懂度函数，同时也得出了Auditec版本的函数。结果表明，Auditec版的NU-6具有良好的列表间等效性。Auditec版和西北大学版NU-6的比较可懂度函数进一步表明了两个录音之间的差异，但得出的结论是，出于临床目的，这两个版本可被视为等效。
