Suppr超能文献

泼尼松和硫唑嘌呤治疗的杜氏肌营养不良症患者肌肉活检的单核细胞分析

Mononuclear cell analysis of muscle biopsies in prednisone- and azathioprine-treated Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

作者信息

Kissel J T, Lynn D J, Rammohan K W, Klein J P, Griggs R C, Moxley R T, Cwik V A, Brooke M H, Mendell J R

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Ohio State University, Columbus.

出版信息

Neurology. 1993 Mar;43(3 Pt 1):532-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.3_part_1.532.

Abstract

Prednisone improves strength and function in patients with Duchenne dystrophy. Although the mechanism of this effect is uncertain, prior studies suggested that the benefit might result from immunosuppressive effects on T lymphocytes invading muscle. A recent randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of prednisone and azathioprine demonstrated that azathioprine had no effect in Duchenne dystrophy, raising questions about the role of immunosuppression in mediating clinical improvement. The goal of this current study was to compare the effects of prednisone and azathioprine on mononuclear infiltrates from biopsies performed at the end of the controlled clinical trial (reported separately in the article by Griggs et al on page 520). We studied 14 patients from the prednisone group (0.75 mg/kg/d), 10 from the combination therapy group (prednisone 0.3 mg/kg/d and azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/d), and 13 from the azathioprine group (2.5 mg/kg/d), and used monoclonal antibodies for cell typing. There were no significant differences between the groups for total T cells, T-cell subsets, B cells, natural killer cells, total mononuclear cells, necrotic muscle fibers, or fibers focally invaded by mononuclear cells. These data indicate that azathioprine decreases mononuclear subsets infiltrating muscle to a similar degree as does prednisone, although azathioprine-treated patients do not show a clinical improvement. This implies that immunosuppressive actions on cellular infiltrates in muscle are probably not the primary mechanism of prednisone-induced clinical improvement.

摘要

泼尼松可改善杜氏肌营养不良患者的肌力和功能。尽管这种作用机制尚不确定,但先前的研究表明,其益处可能源于对侵入肌肉的T淋巴细胞的免疫抑制作用。最近一项关于泼尼松和硫唑嘌呤的随机、双盲、对照试验表明,硫唑嘌呤对杜氏肌营养不良无效,这引发了关于免疫抑制在介导临床改善中作用的疑问。本研究的目的是比较泼尼松和硫唑嘌呤对在对照临床试验结束时所取活检组织中单核细胞浸润的影响(Griggs等人在第520页的文章中单独报道)。我们研究了泼尼松组的14例患者(0.75mg/kg/d)、联合治疗组的10例患者(泼尼松0.3mg/kg/d和硫唑嘌呤2.5mg/kg/d)以及硫唑嘌呤组的13例患者(2.5mg/kg/d),并使用单克隆抗体进行细胞分型。在总T细胞、T细胞亚群、B细胞、自然杀伤细胞、总单核细胞、坏死肌纤维或被单核细胞局灶性浸润的纤维方面,各组之间无显著差异。这些数据表明,硫唑嘌呤使浸润肌肉的单核细胞亚群减少的程度与泼尼松相似,尽管接受硫唑嘌呤治疗的患者未显示出临床改善。这意味着对肌肉中细胞浸润的免疫抑制作用可能不是泼尼松诱导临床改善的主要机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验