Suppr超能文献

利巴韦林治疗呼吸道合胞病毒感染疗效的历史性队列评估

Historical cohort evaluation of ribavirin efficacy in respiratory syncytial virus infection.

作者信息

Wheeler J G, Wofford J, Turner R B

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993 Mar;12(3):209-13. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199303000-00007.

Abstract

Evaluation of ribavirin therapy for respiratory syncytial virus infection of the lower respiratory tract is problematic because of multiple risk factors and variable severity of illness in respiratory syncytial virus-infected patients. To address these difficulties we used multivariate analysis and performed a historical concurrent cohort study in two children's hospitals one of which had used ribavirin since licensing and one that had not utilized ribavirin therapy. The medical records of 158 patients who satisfied the American Academy of Pediatrics inclusion criteria for receiving ribavirin were analyzed for three seasons (1988 to 1991). No significant benefit of ribavirin therapy could be appreciated for the whole group in length of stay (median, 5.0 vs. 6.5 days), days on oxygen therapy (median, 5 vs. 3), progression to ventilator status (3.8 vs. 3.9%) or mortality (1.9% vs. 1.9%) for ribavirin treatment vs. supportive care. Multivariate analysis failed to uncover a beneficial effect of ribavirin when all risk factors were considered. No significant differences were noted when ventilated and nonventilated patients were examined separately. Our data raise questions about the efficacy of ribavirin when used in common practice and suggest that further prospective study, with appropriate analysis, is needed to justify the continued widespread use of this drug.

摘要

评估利巴韦林治疗下呼吸道呼吸道合胞病毒感染存在问题,因为呼吸道合胞病毒感染患者存在多种风险因素且病情严重程度各异。为解决这些难题,我们采用多变量分析,并在两家儿童医院开展了一项历史性同期队列研究,其中一家自利巴韦林获批上市后就开始使用,另一家未采用利巴韦林治疗。对符合美国儿科学会利巴韦林治疗纳入标准的158例患者的病历进行了三个季节(1988年至1991年)的分析。在住院时间(中位数,5.0天对6.5天)、吸氧治疗天数(中位数,5天对3天)、进展至使用呼吸机状态(3.8%对3.9%)或死亡率(1.9%对1.9%)方面,利巴韦林治疗组与支持治疗组相比,未发现利巴韦林治疗对整个群体有显著益处。在考虑所有风险因素时,多变量分析未发现利巴韦林有有益效果。分别检查使用呼吸机和未使用呼吸机的患者时,未发现显著差异。我们的数据对利巴韦林在常规临床应用中的疗效提出了疑问,并表明需要进行进一步的前瞻性研究及适当分析,以证明继续广泛使用该药物的合理性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验