• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿的基础免疫接种程序:两种成分的无细胞百日咳疫苗与标准全细胞百日咳疫苗分别与白喉-破伤风类毒素联合使用的比较。

Primary immunization series for infants: comparison of two-component acellular and standard whole-cell pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria-tetanus toxoids.

作者信息

Feldman S, Perry C S, Andrew M, Jones L, Moffitt J E, Lamb D, Meschievitz C

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216.

出版信息

South Med J. 1993 Mar;86(3):269-75, 284.

PMID:8451663
Abstract

At 2 months of age, 145 infants were randomized to receive either a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine [lymphocytosis-promoting factor (LPF)/filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA)] or standard whole-cell pertussis vaccine, each combined with diphtheria-tetanus toxoids, as their primary immunization series. Of the 132 subjects (91%) who completed the study, those receiving the acellular vaccine had significantly fewer adverse reactions: 5% vs 30% (local) and 17% vs 30% (systemic, including fever). During the first 24 hours acetaminophen usage, a general measure of adverse reactions, was lower in the test group. Overall, 35% of the acellular vaccine doses were reaction free vs 12% of the whole-cell doses. No serious reactions occurred in either group. Antibody responses to LPF and to FHA were significantly increased after the second and third immunizations with the test vaccine and were consistently higher than levels achieved with the standard vaccine. Thus the two-component acellular pertussis vaccine was associated with fewer adverse reactions and improved serologic responses to LPF and FHA as compared with the currently recommended whole-cell vaccine.

摘要

在2个月大时,145名婴儿被随机分为两组,一组接受两成分无细胞百日咳疫苗[淋巴细胞增多促进因子(LPF)/丝状血凝素(FHA)],另一组接受标准全细胞百日咳疫苗,每组均与白喉-破伤风类毒素联合,作为其初次免疫系列。在完成研究的132名受试者(91%)中,接受无细胞疫苗的受试者不良反应明显较少:局部反应为5%对30%,全身反应(包括发热)为17%对30%。在最初24小时内,作为不良反应一般指标的对乙酰氨基酚使用量,试验组较低。总体而言,35%的无细胞疫苗剂量无反应,而全细胞疫苗剂量为12%。两组均未发生严重反应。用试验疫苗进行第二次和第三次免疫后,对LPF和FHA的抗体反应显著增加,且始终高于标准疫苗所达到的水平。因此,与目前推荐的全细胞疫苗相比,两成分无细胞百日咳疫苗不良反应较少,对LPF和FHA的血清学反应有所改善。

相似文献

1
Primary immunization series for infants: comparison of two-component acellular and standard whole-cell pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria-tetanus toxoids.婴儿的基础免疫接种程序:两种成分的无细胞百日咳疫苗与标准全细胞百日咳疫苗分别与白喉-破伤风类毒素联合使用的比较。
South Med J. 1993 Mar;86(3):269-75, 284.
2
Dose-response to a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine in infants and comparison with whole-cell vaccine.婴儿对双组分无细胞百日咳疫苗的剂量反应及与全细胞疫苗的比较。
Biologicals. 1998 Jun;26(2):145-53. doi: 10.1006/biol.1998.9999.
3
A placebo-controlled trial of a pertussis-toxoid vaccine.一项百日咳类毒素疫苗的安慰剂对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 1995 Oct 19;333(16):1045-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199510193331604.
4
Acellular pertussis vaccination of 2-month-old infants in the United States.
Pediatrics. 1992 May;89(5 Pt 1):882-7.
5
Acellular and whole-cell pertussis vaccines as booster doses: a multicenter study.
Pediatrics. 1994 Jan;93(1):37-43.
6
Comparison of diphtheria-tetanus-two component acellular pertussis vaccines in United States and Japanese infants at 2, 4, and 6 months of age.美国和日本2、4、6月龄婴儿白喉-破伤风-双组分无细胞百日咳疫苗的比较。
Pediatrics. 1996 Feb;97(2):236-42.
7
An open study evaluating the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a DTP vaccine containing an acellular pertussis component in four to six year old children.
Dev Biol Stand. 1985;61:563-9.
8
An adolescent-adult formulation tetanus and diptheria toxoids adsorbed combined with acellular pertussis vaccine has comparable immunogenicity but less reactogenicity in children 4-6 years of age than a pediatric formulation acellular pertussis vaccine and diphtheria and tetanus toxoids adsorbed combined with inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine.一种青少年-成人剂型的吸附破伤风和白喉类毒素与无细胞百日咳疫苗联合制剂,在4至6岁儿童中与一种儿科剂型的无细胞百日咳疫苗及吸附白喉和破伤风类毒素与灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗联合制剂相比,具有相当的免疫原性,但反应原性较低。
Vaccine. 2007 Jan 22;25(6):1121-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.09.053. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
9
Safety and immunogenicity of Haemophilus influenzae-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine given separately or in combination with a three-component acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and inactivated poliovirus vaccine for the first four doses.分别接种或与包含白喉和破伤风类毒素及灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗的三组分无细胞百日咳疫苗联合接种时,流感嗜血杆菌-破伤风类毒素结合疫苗头四剂的安全性和免疫原性。
Clin Infect Dis. 1999 May;28(5):995-1001. doi: 10.1086/514741.
10
Minor adverse events in a comparative efficacy trial in Germany in infants receiving either the Lederle/Takeda acellular pertussis component DTP (DTaP) vaccine, the Lederle whole-cell component DTP (DTP) or DT vaccine. The Pertussis Vaccine Study Group.在德国进行的一项比较疗效试验中,接受礼来/武田无细胞百日咳组分白喉破伤风百日咳疫苗(DTaP)、礼来全细胞组分白喉破伤风百日咳疫苗(DTP)或白喉破伤风疫苗(DT)的婴儿出现的轻微不良事件。百日咳疫苗研究组。
Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:113-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Whole-cell pertussis vaccine in early infancy for the prevention of allergy in children.婴幼儿全细胞百日咳疫苗预防儿童过敏。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD013682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013682.pub2.
2
Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children.用于预防儿童百日咳的无细胞疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 17;2014(9):CD001478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001478.pub6.
3
Monokine production following in vitro stimulation of the THP-1 human monocytic cell line with pertussis vaccine components.
用百日咳疫苗成分体外刺激THP-1人单核细胞系后单核因子的产生。
J Clin Immunol. 1998 Jan;18(1):81-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1023296022603.
4
Acellular pertussis vaccines. Towards an improved safety profile.无细胞百日咳疫苗。迈向更优的安全性概况。
Drug Saf. 1996 Nov;15(5):311-24. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615050-00002.