• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氟罗沙星与诺氟沙星口服治疗严重尿路感染的比较。

Fleroxacin versus norfloxacin for oral treatment of serious urinary tract infections.

作者信息

Childs S J

机构信息

Brookwood Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35209.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):105S-107S.

PMID:8452164
Abstract

Fleroxacin, 400 mg once daily, and norfloxacin, 400 mg twice daily, both administered orally, were compared for the treatment of serious urinary tract infections (UTIs). In total, 301 patients from multiple centers who had serious UTIs were randomized to receive fleroxacin or norfloxacin in a double-blind study. The demographic parameters of the two groups were similar. A total of 190 patients were evaluable for efficacy, 94 in the fleroxacin group and 96 in the norfloxacin group. The reasons for exclusion from the efficacy analysis were not significantly different in the two groups, but more patients receiving fleroxacin were prematurely withdrawn from the study. The majority (134) of the diagnoses were complicated UTI, and the pathogens were primarily Enterobacteriaceae. The clinical responses were cure or improvement in 98% of the fleroxacin group and 92% of the norfloxacin group and failure in 2% of the fleroxacin group and 7% of the norfloxacin group. The bacteriologic results by infection were cure in 98% of the fleroxacin group and 89% of the norfloxacin group (including cure with superinfection in 4% of the fleroxacin group and 5% of the norfloxacin group) and failure in 2% of the fleroxacin group and 11% of the norfloxacin group. Adverse events were more common in the fleroxacin group and were mostly nausea, insomnia, and headache. Fleroxacin, 400 mg once daily, was as effective as norfloxacin, 400 mg twice daily, in eradicating UTIs but was associated with more adverse events.

摘要

对氟罗沙星(每日一次,每次400毫克)和诺氟沙星(每日两次,每次400毫克)口服治疗严重尿路感染(UTI)的效果进行了比较。在一项双盲研究中,来自多个中心的301例患有严重UTI的患者被随机分配接受氟罗沙星或诺氟沙星治疗。两组的人口统计学参数相似。共有190例患者可进行疗效评估,氟罗沙星组94例,诺氟沙星组96例。两组中被排除在疗效分析之外的原因无显著差异,但接受氟罗沙星治疗的患者中有更多人提前退出研究。大多数(134例)诊断为复杂性UTI,病原体主要为肠杆菌科细菌。氟罗沙星组98%、诺氟沙星组92%的临床反应为治愈或改善,氟罗沙星组2%、诺氟沙星组7%的临床反应为失败。按感染情况的细菌学结果显示,氟罗沙星组98%、诺氟沙星组89%治愈(氟罗沙星组4%、诺氟沙星组5%包括重叠感染治愈),氟罗沙星组2%、诺氟沙星组11%治疗失败。氟罗沙星组的不良事件更为常见,主要是恶心、失眠和头痛。每日一次服用400毫克氟罗沙星在根除UTI方面与每日两次服用400毫克诺氟沙星效果相当,但不良事件更多。

相似文献

1
Fleroxacin versus norfloxacin for oral treatment of serious urinary tract infections.氟罗沙星与诺氟沙星口服治疗严重尿路感染的比较。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):105S-107S.
2
Randomized double-blind trial of high- and low-dose fleroxacin versus norfloxacin for complicated urinary tract infection.高剂量和低剂量氟罗沙星与诺氟沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的随机双盲试验。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):101S-104S.
3
Fleroxacin versus norfloxacin in the treatment of urinary tract infections: a multicenter, double-blind, prospective, randomized, comparative study.氟罗沙星与诺氟沙星治疗尿路感染的多中心、双盲、前瞻性、随机对照研究
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):108S-113S.
4
Multicenter study of single-dose and multiple-dose fleroxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections.单剂量和多剂量氟罗沙星与环丙沙星治疗单纯性尿路感染的多中心研究。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):89S-96S.
5
Fleroxacin versus ofloxacin in patients with complicated urinary tract infection: a controlled clinical study.氟罗沙星与氧氟沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的对照临床研究。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):114S-117S.
6
Comparison of intravenous fleroxacin with ceftazidime for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.静脉注射氟罗沙星与头孢他啶治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):118S-125S.
7
Once-daily fleroxacin versus twice-daily ciprofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.每日一次氟罗沙星与每日两次环丙沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。
J Urol. 1997 Oct;158(4):1494-9.
8
A sequential study of intravenous and oral fleroxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection.静脉注射与口服氟罗沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的序贯研究
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):126S-130S.
9
Comparative efficacy and safety of oral fleroxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium in skin and soft tissue infections.口服氟罗沙星与阿莫西林/克拉维酸钾治疗皮肤及软组织感染的疗效和安全性比较
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):159S-165S.
10
Fleroxacin versus amoxicillin in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.氟罗沙星与阿莫西林治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的对比研究
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):136S-141S.

引用本文的文献

1
Complicated urinary tract infection in adults.成人复杂性尿路感染。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2005 Nov;16(6):349-60. doi: 10.1155/2005/385768.
2
Fleroxacin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in various infections.氟罗沙星。对其在各种感染中的药理学及治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1995 May;49(5):794-850. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549050-00010.