• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉注射氟罗沙星与头孢他啶治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。

Comparison of intravenous fleroxacin with ceftazidime for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

作者信息

Cox C E

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):118S-125S.

PMID:8452167
Abstract

Intravenous fleroxacin, 400 mg once daily, was compared with intravenous ceftazidime, 0.5-2 g three times a day or 1-2 g twice a day, administered for 4-21 days for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to susceptible organisms. Fleroxacin also was tested in an uncontrolled trial. The trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label study of adults with pyelonephritis or signs and symptoms of UTI and complicating factors. In the controlled trial, 474 patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive fleroxacin (n = 320) or ceftazidime (n = 154). The microbiologic criterion for diagnosis of UTI was the isolation of > or = 10(5) colony-forming units (CFU) of pathogenic bacteria/mL of urine. The efficacy analyses included 165 fleroxacin-treated and 82 ceftazidime-treated patients in the controlled trial and 97 patients in the uncontrolled trial. In the controlled trial, 317 fleroxacin-treated and 150 ceftazidime-treated patients were included in the safety analysis. In the controlled trial, the respective rates of bacteriologic cure (< or = 10(4) CFU/mL of urine 48-96 hours after first dose and 2-5 days posttherapy) were 94% (confidence interval [CI], 89-97%) and 95% (CI, 88-99%) in the fleroxacin and ceftazidime groups, and those of clinical cure were 86% (CI, 80-91%) and 89% (CI, 80-95%). Rates of clinical and bacteriologic cure in the uncontrolled study were 95%. In the controlled trial, 9% of the patients in each treatment group experienced one or more adverse events possibly or probably related to the study drug. The percentage of patients terminating therapy prematurely was higher in the fleroxacin than in the ceftazidime group. Once-daily dosing with 400 mg of intravenous fleroxacin was equivalent to a standard multidose regimen with respect to rates of bacteriologic and clinical cure in the treatment of complicated UTI.

摘要

将每日一次静脉注射400毫克氟罗沙星,与每日三次静脉注射0.5 - 2克或每日两次静脉注射1 - 2克的头孢他啶进行比较,给药4 - 21天,用于治疗由敏感菌引起的复杂性尿路感染(UTIs)。氟罗沙星也在一项非对照试验中进行了测试。该试验是一项针对患有肾盂肾炎或UTI体征和症状以及复杂因素的成年人的多中心、随机、开放标签研究。在对照试验中,474名患者按2:1的比例随机分配接受氟罗沙星(n = 320)或头孢他啶(n = 154)治疗。UTI诊断的微生物学标准是每毫升尿液中分离出≥10⁵个病原菌菌落形成单位(CFU)。疗效分析包括对照试验中165名接受氟罗沙星治疗的患者和82名接受头孢他啶治疗的患者,以及非对照试验中的97名患者。在对照试验中,317名接受氟罗沙星治疗的患者和150名接受头孢他啶治疗的患者纳入安全性分析。在对照试验中,氟罗沙星组和头孢他啶组细菌学治愈(首剂后48 - 96小时及治疗后2 - 5天尿液中≤10⁴CFU/mL)的相应率分别为94%(置信区间[CI],89 - 97%)和95%(CI,88 - 99%),临床治愈的相应率分别为86%(CI,80 - 91%)和89%(CI,80 - 95%)。非对照研究中的临床和细菌学治愈率为95%。在对照试验中,每个治疗组9%的患者经历了一个或多个可能或很可能与研究药物相关的不良事件。氟罗沙星组中过早终止治疗的患者百分比高于头孢他啶组。在治疗复杂性UTI方面,每日一次静脉注射400毫克氟罗沙星在细菌学和临床治愈率方面等同于标准多剂量方案。

相似文献

1
Comparison of intravenous fleroxacin with ceftazidime for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.静脉注射氟罗沙星与头孢他啶治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):118S-125S.
2
Intravenous fleroxacin versus ceftazidime in the treatment of acute nonpneumococcal lower respiratory tract infections.
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):142S-149S.
3
Systemic antimicrobial therapy for skin and skin structure infections: comparison of fleroxacin and ceftazidime.用于皮肤及皮肤结构感染的全身抗菌治疗:氟罗沙星与头孢他啶的比较
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):166S-173S.
4
A sequential study of intravenous and oral fleroxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection.静脉注射与口服氟罗沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的序贯研究
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):126S-130S.
5
Fleroxacin versus norfloxacin in the treatment of urinary tract infections: a multicenter, double-blind, prospective, randomized, comparative study.氟罗沙星与诺氟沙星治疗尿路感染的多中心、双盲、前瞻性、随机对照研究
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):108S-113S.
6
Randomized double-blind trial of high- and low-dose fleroxacin versus norfloxacin for complicated urinary tract infection.高剂量和低剂量氟罗沙星与诺氟沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的随机双盲试验。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):101S-104S.
7
Fleroxacin versus norfloxacin for oral treatment of serious urinary tract infections.氟罗沙星与诺氟沙星口服治疗严重尿路感染的比较。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):105S-107S.
8
Multicenter study of single-dose and multiple-dose fleroxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections.单剂量和多剂量氟罗沙星与环丙沙星治疗单纯性尿路感染的多中心研究。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):89S-96S.
9
Once-daily fleroxacin versus twice-daily ciprofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.每日一次氟罗沙星与每日两次环丙沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。
J Urol. 1997 Oct;158(4):1494-9.
10
Fleroxacin versus ofloxacin in patients with complicated urinary tract infection: a controlled clinical study.氟罗沙星与氧氟沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的对照临床研究。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):114S-117S.

引用本文的文献

1
Complicated urinary tract infection in adults.成人复杂性尿路感染。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2005 Nov;16(6):349-60. doi: 10.1155/2005/385768.
2
Pharmacokinetic characteristics of antimicrobials and optimal treatment of urosepsis.抗菌药物的药代动力学特征与尿脓毒症的优化治疗
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46(4):291-305. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200746040-00003.
3
Role of fluoroquinolones in the treatment of serious bacterial urinary tract infections.氟喹诺酮类药物在严重细菌性尿路感染治疗中的作用。
Drugs. 2004;64(12):1359-73. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464120-00007.
4
Ceftazidime. An update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.头孢他啶。其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗效果的最新进展。
Drugs. 1995 Apr;49(4):577-617. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549040-00008.
5
Fleroxacin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in various infections.氟罗沙星。对其在各种感染中的药理学及治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1995 May;49(5):794-850. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549050-00010.