Suppr超能文献

用于皮肤及皮肤结构感染的全身抗菌治疗:氟罗沙星与头孢他啶的比较

Systemic antimicrobial therapy for skin and skin structure infections: comparison of fleroxacin and ceftazidime.

作者信息

Parish L C, Jungkind D L

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):166S-173S.

PMID:8452175
Abstract

Intravenous fleroxacin, 400 mg once a day, was compared with ceftazidime, 0.5-2 g three times a day or 1-2 g twice a day, for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Duration of treatment was 4-21 days. The study was a multicenter, unblinded comparison. Of the 316 patients enrolled, 212 were randomized to treatment with fleroxacin and 104 to ceftazidime (2:1 ratio); 92 fleroxacin-treated patients and 50 ceftazidime-treated patients were included in the standard analysis of efficacy. The most common diagnoses were wound infections and cellulitis, which affected 36% and 30% of the fleroxacin group, and 24% and 24% of the ceftazidime group, respectively. In the fleroxacin group, 82% of the infecting organisms were eradicated, and in the ceftazidime group, 79%. The overall rates of bacteriologic cure, by infection, were 79% for the fleroxacin group and 74% for the ceftazidime group, and those for clinical cure were 82% and 73%, respectively. It could not be concluded with 95% confidence that the two regimens resulted in equivalent cure rates because the range of between-group differences was outside the stipulated limits of +/- 15%. The percentage of patients with one or more adverse events was approximately twice as high (17% vs. 9%) in the fleroxacin group than in the ceftazidime group. The most frequent event in both groups was nausea. In this study, intravenous therapy with fleroxacin or ceftazidime produced similar bacteriologic and clinical cure rates, but the statistical requirements permitting a conclusion of equivalence at protocol levels were not met.

摘要

将每天一次静脉注射400毫克氟罗沙星与每天三次0.5 - 2克或每天两次1 - 2克的头孢他啶进行比较,用于治疗皮肤及皮肤结构感染。治疗持续时间为4 - 21天。该研究为多中心、非盲法比较。在纳入的316例患者中,212例被随机分配接受氟罗沙星治疗,104例接受头孢他啶治疗(比例为2:1);92例接受氟罗沙星治疗的患者和50例接受头孢他啶治疗的患者纳入疗效标准分析。最常见的诊断为伤口感染和蜂窝织炎,分别影响氟罗沙星组的36%和30%,以及头孢他啶组的24%和24%。在氟罗沙星组,82%的感染病原体被根除,在头孢他啶组为79%。按感染情况,氟罗沙星组细菌学治愈率总体为79%,头孢他啶组为74%,临床治愈率分别为82%和73%。由于组间差异范围超出规定的±15%界限,无法以95%的置信度得出两种治疗方案治愈率相当的结论。氟罗沙星组出现一种或多种不良事件的患者百分比约为头孢他啶组的两倍(17%对9%)。两组中最常见的事件均为恶心。在本研究中,静脉注射氟罗沙星或头孢他啶产生了相似的细菌学和临床治愈率,但未满足在方案层面得出等效性结论的统计学要求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验