• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Intravenous fleroxacin versus ceftazidime in the treatment of acute nonpneumococcal lower respiratory tract infections.

作者信息

Farkas S A

机构信息

Barberton Citizens Hospital, Ohio 44203.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):142S-149S.

PMID:8452171
Abstract

Fleroxacin, administered intravenously at a dosage of 400 mg once a day, was compared with ceftazidime, 0.5-2 g three times daily or 1-2 g twice daily, administered for 4-21 days, for treatment of nonpneumococcal lower respiratory tract infections. A total of 319 patients were enrolled and randomized to receive treatment with fleroxacin or ceftazidime in a 2:1 ratio. Of those enrolled, 68 fleroxacin- and 49 ceftazidime-treated patients were included in the efficacy analysis. The most common diagnoses were pneumonia or pneumonitis (47% of the fleroxacin group and 57% of the ceftazidime group) and exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (38% and 33%, respectively). In the fleroxacin group, 59 (88%) of 67 patients were bacteriologic cures, and in the ceftazidime group, 40 (90%) of 49 were bacteriologic cures. It could be concluded with 95% confidence that the bacteriologic outcomes, by infection, for the two groups were equivalent (fleroxacin, 88%; ceftazidime, 90%). The rates of clinical cure were 59 (88%) of 67 for the fleroxacin group and 40 (82%) of 49 in the ceftazidime group, but since the 95% confidence limit around the between-group difference was greater than the stipulated +/- 15%, it could not be concluded that the outcomes were equivalent. The percentage of patients who experienced adverse clinical or laboratory events was similar in the two treatment groups (12% and 13%). The bacteriologic outcomes, by infection, were equivalent for the two treatment groups. Protocol requirements permitting a determination of equivalence of the outcomes for clinical cure were not met, although the rates were similar.

摘要

相似文献

1
Intravenous fleroxacin versus ceftazidime in the treatment of acute nonpneumococcal lower respiratory tract infections.
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):142S-149S.
2
Comparison of intravenous fleroxacin with ceftazidime for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.静脉注射氟罗沙星与头孢他啶治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):118S-125S.
3
Systemic antimicrobial therapy for skin and skin structure infections: comparison of fleroxacin and ceftazidime.用于皮肤及皮肤结构感染的全身抗菌治疗:氟罗沙星与头孢他啶的比较
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):166S-173S.
4
Intravenous fleroxacin versus ceftazidime for lower respiratory tract and skin and soft-tissue infections.
Clin Ther. 1992 Jul-Aug;14(4):595-602.
5
Fleroxacin versus amoxicillin in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.氟罗沙星与阿莫西林治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的对比研究
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):136S-141S.
6
Multicenter study of single-dose and multiple-dose fleroxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections.单剂量和多剂量氟罗沙星与环丙沙星治疗单纯性尿路感染的多中心研究。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):89S-96S.
7
Fleroxacin versus norfloxacin in the treatment of urinary tract infections: a multicenter, double-blind, prospective, randomized, comparative study.氟罗沙星与诺氟沙星治疗尿路感染的多中心、双盲、前瞻性、随机对照研究
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):108S-113S.
8
Efficacy of fleroxacin versus amoxicillin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):131S-135S.
9
The efficacy and safety of isepamicin and ceftazidime compared with amikacin and ceftazidime in acute lower respiratory tract infection.异帕米星与头孢他啶联用对比阿米卡星与头孢他啶联用在急性下呼吸道感染中的疗效及安全性
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:129-35.
10
A sequential study of intravenous and oral fleroxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection.静脉注射与口服氟罗沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的序贯研究
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):126S-130S.

引用本文的文献

1
Ceftazidime. An update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.头孢他啶。其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗效果的最新进展。
Drugs. 1995 Apr;49(4):577-617. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549040-00008.
2
Fleroxacin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in various infections.氟罗沙星。对其在各种感染中的药理学及治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1995 May;49(5):794-850. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549050-00010.