Yurino M, Kimura H
Department of Anesthesia, Asahikawa Medical College, Hokkaido, Japan.
Anesth Analg. 1993 Mar;76(3):598-601. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199303000-00026.
In this study, the vital capacity rapid inhalation induction of anesthesia (VCRII) technique and the conventional spontaneous inhalation induction technique, each using 4.5% sevoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen, were compared. The VSRII group (n = 32) and conventional group (n = 32) were each tested on unpremedicated volunteers. VCRII required only half the time of conventional inhalation induction (54 s and 108 s, respectively), and was not associated with cardiovascular instability. Each of the two techniques was found acceptable by most of the volunteers studied (more than 80%). However, sevoflurane is best used with the VCRII technique because VCRII resulted in fewer excitement movements that could lead to severe complications and pronounced excitement.
在本研究中，对肺活量快速吸入诱导麻醉（VCRII）技术和传统的自主吸入诱导技术进行了比较，两种技术均使用4.5%的七氟醚与一氧化二氮和氧气混合。VCRII组（n = 32）和传统组（n = 32）分别对未使用术前药的志愿者进行测试。VCRII所需时间仅为传统吸入诱导的一半（分别为54秒和108秒），且与心血管不稳定无关。研究中的大多数志愿者（超过80%）认为这两种技术均可接受。然而，七氟醚最好与VCRII技术一起使用，因为VCRII导致的兴奋动作较少，这些动作可能导致严重并发症和明显的兴奋。
