• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上颌前牵引:对单侧和双侧唇腭裂患者面部形态的不同影响。

Maxillary protraction: different effects on facial morphology in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.

作者信息

Tindlund R S, Rygh P

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics, School of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993 Mar;30(2):208-21. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0208_mpdeof_2.3.co_2.

DOI:10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0208_mpdeof_2.3.co_2
PMID:8452843
Abstract

Since 1977 patients with anterior/posterior crossbites in the care of the Bergen CLP team have undergone an interceptive orthopedic protraction phase during the deciduous and mixed dentition period. Eighty-seven cases with complete clefts (63 unilateral and 24 bilateral) displaying anterior crossbite (negative overjet) were treated to normal occlusion. A fixed quad-helix appliance was used in combination with a facial mask. In the unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP) group, mean age at start of treatment was 6 years 10 months and mean duration was 12 months. In the bilateral complete cleft lip and palate (BCLP) group, mean age at start of treatment was 7 years and mean duration 15 months. The protraction force was 700 g. The sagittal changes during protraction in the UCLP and BCLP groups were compared, and related to the growth changes in a group of noncleft children at the same age. Dentofacial treatment effect was different in the UCLP and BCLP groups. Significant increase of maxillary prognathism (angle s-n-ss) was found only in the UCLP group, whereas the treatment effect in the BCLP group was mainly dentoalveolar. However, after protraction there was no longer a significant difference in maxillary prognathism between the two CLP groups, and the sagittal position of the upper molars was normalized in both groups. The upper incisors remained retroclined in both groups, significantly more in the BCLP group. Increase of the upper facial height (n-sp") and clockwise rotation of the occlusal line were significantly greater in the BCLP group. The computerized occlusal line was unsuitable as a reference standard for the evaluation of sagittal dentofacial treatment changes when the occlusal line was rotated during treatment.

摘要

自1977年以来,卑尔根唇腭裂治疗团队所诊治的前后牙反合患者在乳牙列和混合牙列期均经历了一期阻断性正畸前牵引阶段。87例完全性腭裂患者(63例单侧、24例双侧)伴有前牙反合(覆合为负),均接受治疗至正常咬合。采用固定四螺旋矫治器联合面罩进行治疗。在单侧完全性唇腭裂(UCLP)组,治疗开始时的平均年龄为6岁10个月,平均疗程为12个月。在双侧完全性唇腭裂(BCLP)组,治疗开始时的平均年龄为7岁,平均疗程为15个月。牵引力量为700克。比较了UCLP组和BCLP组牵引过程中的矢状向变化,并与一组同龄非腭裂儿童的生长变化进行了关联分析。UCLP组和BCLP组的牙颌面治疗效果有所不同。仅在UCLP组发现上颌前突(s-n-ss角)显著增加,而BCLP组的治疗效果主要体现在牙槽骨方面。然而,牵引后两组唇腭裂患者在上颌前突方面不再存在显著差异,且两组上颌磨牙的矢状位置均恢复正常。两组患者的上前牙均保持舌倾,BCLP组更为明显。BCLP组的面中高度(n-sp")增加及咬合平面顺时针旋转更为显著。当治疗过程中咬合平面发生旋转时,计算机化咬合平面不适用于评估矢状向牙颌面治疗变化的参考标准。

相似文献

1
Maxillary protraction: different effects on facial morphology in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.上颌前牵引:对单侧和双侧唇腭裂患者面部形态的不同影响。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993 Mar;30(2):208-21. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0208_mpdeof_2.3.co_2.
2
Soft-tissue profile changes during widening and protraction of the maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate compared with normal growth and development.唇腭裂患者上颌骨扩弓和前牵引过程中软组织侧貌变化与正常生长发育的比较。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993 Sep;30(5):454-68. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0454_stpcdw_2.3.co_2.
3
Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before age 10 years.10岁前唇腭裂患者对上颌前牵引的骨骼反应。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994 Jul;31(4):295-308. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1994_031_0295_srtmpi_2.3.co_2.
4
Orthopedic protraction of the upper jaw in cleft lip and palate patients during the deciduous and mixed dentition periods in comparison with normal growth and development.唇腭裂患者在乳牙期和混合牙列期上颌骨的正畸前牵引与正常生长发育的比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993 Mar;30(2):182-94. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0182_opotuj_2.3.co_2.
5
Intercanine widening and sagittal effect of maxillary transverse expansion in patients with cleft lip and palate during the deciduous and mixed dentitions.唇腭裂患者乳牙列和混合牙列期上颌横向扩弓的犬齿间增宽及矢状向效应
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993 Mar;30(2):195-207. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0195_iwaseo_2.3.co_2.
6
Effects of maxillary protraction combined with chin-cap therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.上颌前牵引联合颏兜治疗对单侧唇腭裂患者的影响。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000 Jan;37(1):92-7. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0092_eompcw_2.3.co_2.
7
Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.单侧和双侧唇腭裂患者使用面具式上颌骨前牵引和微型板锚固的效果比较。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):935-41. doi: 10.2319/010112-1.1. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
8
Face mask therapy of preadolescents with unilateral cleft lip and palate.青春期前单侧唇腭裂患儿的面罩治疗
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(2):145-50. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0145:FMTOPW>2.0.CO;2.
9
Effect of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting on the Maxillary Growth: Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.二期牙槽骨植骨对上颌骨生长的影响:单侧与双侧唇腭裂患者对比
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Oct;26(7):2128-32. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002133.
10
Maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate in mixed dentition: cephalometric evaluation after completion of growth.混合牙列期唇腭裂患者的上颌前牵引:生长完成后的头影测量评估
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Sep;51(5):514-24. doi: 10.1597/12-032. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Secondary Bilateral Cleft Lip Deformity Correction With Modified Double Z-Plasty to Reconstruct Cupid's Bow.采用改良双Z成形术矫正继发性双侧唇裂畸形以重建唇弓。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 3;17(6):e85267. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85267. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Orthodontic Status and Association with Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life-A Study of 16-Year-Old Norwegians with a Cleft Lip and Palate.正畸状况及其与口腔健康相关生活质量的关系——一项对 16 岁唇腭裂挪威人的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 26;21(5):550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050550.
3
Comparison of different maxillary advancement protocols in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a finite element analysis.
不同上颌骨前徙方案在单侧唇腭裂患者中的比较:有限元分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Apr 20;28(5):260. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05633-2.
4
Bone-anchored maxillary protraction long-term outcomes in UCLP.UCLP 患者上颌骨骨锚固牵引的长期疗效。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Sep 1;90(5):734-741. doi: 10.2319/121219-795.1.
5
Mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in patients with UCLP: A 3-D preliminary assessment.单侧完全性唇腭裂患者采用骨锚式上颌前牵引治疗后下颌及关节窝的变化:三维初步评估
Angle Orthod. 2017 May;87(3):423-431. doi: 10.2319/052516-419.1. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
6
Treatment Options for Class III Malocclusion in Growing Patients with Emphasis on Maxillary Protraction.生长发育期Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的治疗选择:以上颌前牵引为重点
Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:8105163. doi: 10.1155/2016/8105163. Epub 2016 Apr 10.
7
The effects of face mask therapy in cleft lip and palate patients.面罩疗法在唇腭裂患者中的效果。
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jul;2(2):116-20. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.101332.
8
Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.单侧和双侧唇腭裂患者使用面具式上颌骨前牵引和微型板锚固的效果比较。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):935-41. doi: 10.2319/010112-1.1. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
9
3D soft tissue changes in facial morphology in patients with cleft lip and palate and class III mal occlusion under therapy with rapid maxillary expansion and delaire facemask.唇腭裂合并III类错牙合患者在快速上颌扩弓和戴莱尔面罩治疗下面部形态的三维软组织变化
J Orofac Orthop. 2010 Mar;71(2):136-51. doi: 10.1007/s00056-010-9931-0. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
10
Current knowledge in cleft lip and palate treatment from an orthodontist's point of view.从正畸医生角度看唇腭裂治疗的当前知识。
J Orofac Orthop. 1998;59(6):313-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01299768.