Faraker C A
Cytology Department, Royal East Sussex Hospital, Hastings, UK.
Cytopathology. 1993;4(1):47-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1993.tb00072.x.
Partial rescreening was carried out on 9633 cervical smears reported as negative by standard screening. Each slide was 'step-screened' at normal speed for 30 s. Thirteen false negative smears were detected by this method. No false negatives were revealed by conventionally rescreening 10% of the same study group. The sensitivity of the method was assessed by 'step-screening' 100 known positive smears. Of this group 92 were detected. The results indicate that partial rescreening is a sensitive method of quality assurance and should replace conventional 10% proportional rescreening, which is ineffective.
对9633份经标准筛查报告为阴性的宫颈涂片进行了部分复查。每张玻片以正常速度“逐步筛查”30秒。通过这种方法检测出13例假阴性涂片。对同一研究组的10%进行常规复查未发现假阴性。通过对100份已知阳性涂片进行“逐步筛查”来评估该方法的敏感性。在这一组中检测出92份。结果表明,部分复查是一种敏感的质量保证方法,应取代无效的传统10%比例复查。