Dudding N
Yorkshire Regional Cytology Training School, Department of Histopathology, General Infirmary at Leeds, UK.
Cytopathology. 1995 Apr;6(2):95-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1995.tb00453.x.
Rapid rescreening of approximately 30% of all negative and inadequate consecutive smears was carried out over a 26-month period. Smears (n = 24,012) were rescreened using a x6.3 objective only. Two minutes were allowed for each slide. Thirty-nine smears were found to have been incorrectly diagnosed as negative, a rate of 0.16%. This can be compared with the previous 26 months during which the traditional 1 in 10 random rescreening of unsatisfactory and negative smears had been carried out at a routine pace and with an objective of x10. A total of 6866 smears were rescreened. Eleven were found to have been incorrectly diagnosed as negative, a rate of 0.16%. Rapid rescreening is as sensitive as 1 in 10 rescreening, and allows a greater proportion of smears to be rescreened. We propose rapid rescreening should replace the traditional 1 in 10 rescreening methods.
在26个月的时间里,对所有连续的阴性和不合格涂片样本中的约30%进行了快速复查。仅使用6.3倍物镜对涂片样本(n = 24,012)进行复查。每张涂片允许复查两分钟。发现有39张涂片被错误地诊断为阴性,错误率为0.16%。这可以与前26个月进行比较,在前26个月里,以常规速度使用10倍物镜对不满意和阴性涂片进行传统的十分之一随机复查。总共复查了6866张涂片。发现有11张被错误地诊断为阴性,错误率为0.16%。快速复查与十分之一复查的敏感性相同,并且能够复查更大比例的涂片。我们建议快速复查应取代传统的十分之一复查方法。