Suppr超能文献

γ-干扰素对癌胚抗原和胆汁糖蛋白的差异调节

Differential regulation of carcinoembryonic antigen and biliary glycoprotein by gamma-interferon.

作者信息

Takahashi H, Okai Y, Paxton R J, Hefta L J, Shively J E

机构信息

Division of Immunology, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, California 91010.

出版信息

Cancer Res. 1993 Apr 1;53(7):1612-9.

PMID:8453631
Abstract

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), biliary glycoprotein (BGP), and non-specific cross-reacting antigen (NCA) are three closely related cell surface glycoproteins induced by gamma-interferon (IFN-gamma) in colonic epithelial cells. Maximal induction of CEA by IFN-gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) in the colon carcinoma cell line HT-29 occurs at 5-6 days with maximal secreted levels at 14 ng/ml for IFN-gamma and 20 ng/ml for TNF-alpha. Cell viability was reduced to 67% of controls for TNF-alpha and to 36% for IFN-gamma. Dose-response curves showed maximal induction of CEA at 500 units/ml for TNF-alpha and at 200 units/ml for IFN-gamma. Combinations of the two lymphokines revealed that the CEA induction effects were additive and the cytotoxicity effects were synergistic. Northern blot analysis of HT-29 cells treated with IFN-gamma and probed with specific probes for BGP, CEA, and NCA showed a 2-fold increase in mRNA level for BGP, and a greater than 10-fold induction for CEA and NCA. Similar results were obtained for the SW403 cell line, but in the case of the LS174T cell line, CEA mRNA levels remained constant before and after IFN-gamma treatment, while BGP and NCA mRNA levels increased by 2-5-fold. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of the four alternatively spliced transcripts of BGP revealed no differential induction of one transcript over another by IFN-gamma. A comparison of the kinetics of induction of the mRNA levels for BGP and CEA by IFN-gamma in the HT29 cell line revealed a half-time of < 6 h for BGP and 48 h for CEA. The induction of CEA mRNA was completely inhibited with either cycloheximide (protein synthesis inhibitor) or actinomycin D (RNA synthesis inhibitor), but the induction of BGP mRNA was superinduced by cycloheximide. The difference in the kinetics of induction and effect of cycloheximide on CEA and BGP mRNAs suggest that the two genes are regulated differently in the same cell line. We conclude that the regulation occurs mainly at the posttranscriptional level for CEA and involves mRNA stability. BGP regulation may be more complex, involving transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation, and more closely resembles the regulation of MHC class II mRNA by IFN-gamma in epithelial cells. The mRNA stability effects may be mediated by the dramatically different sequences present in the 3'-untranslated regions of CEA and BGP.

摘要

癌胚抗原(CEA)、胆汁糖蛋白(BGP)和非特异性交叉反应抗原(NCA)是结肠上皮细胞中由γ干扰素(IFN-γ)诱导产生的三种密切相关的细胞表面糖蛋白。在结肠癌细胞系HT-29中,IFN-γ和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)对CEA的最大诱导作用出现在5-6天,IFN-γ诱导的最大分泌水平为14 ng/ml,TNF-α为20 ng/ml。TNF-α处理后细胞活力降至对照的67%,IFN-γ处理后降至36%。剂量反应曲线显示,TNF-α在500单位/ml时对CEA的诱导作用最大,IFN-γ在200单位/ml时最大。两种淋巴因子联合作用显示,CEA诱导作用具有相加性,细胞毒性作用具有协同性。用IFN-γ处理HT-29细胞,并分别用针对BGP、CEA和NCA的特异性探针进行Northern印迹分析,结果显示BGP的mRNA水平增加了2倍,CEA和NCA的诱导倍数大于10倍。SW403细胞系也得到了类似结果,但在LS174T细胞系中,IFN-γ处理前后CEA的mRNA水平保持恒定,而BGP和NCA的mRNA水平增加了2-5倍。对BGP的四种可变剪接转录本进行聚合酶链反应分析,结果显示IFN-γ对其中一种转录本的诱导作用并无差异。比较IFN-γ在HT29细胞系中诱导BGP和CEA的mRNA水平的动力学,结果显示BGP的半衰期<6小时,CEA为48小时。用放线菌酮(蛋白质合成抑制剂)或放线菌素D(RNA合成抑制剂)均可完全抑制CEA mRNA的诱导,但放线菌酮可使BGP mRNA的诱导作用超诱导。CEA和BGP mRNA在诱导动力学及放线菌酮作用方面存在差异,这表明在同一细胞系中这两个基因的调控方式不同。我们得出结论,CEA的调控主要发生在转录后水平,涉及mRNA稳定性。BGP的调控可能更为复杂,涉及转录和转录后调控,更类似于上皮细胞中IFN-γ对MHC II类mRNA的调控。mRNA稳定性效应可能由CEA和BGP的3'-非翻译区中存在的显著不同序列介导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验