Suppr超能文献

异环磷酰胺治疗软组织肉瘤:德国埃森西德肿瘤中心的经验

Ifosfamide in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas: experience at the West German Tumor Center, Essen.

作者信息

Schütte J, Kellner R, Seeber S

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Essen Medical School, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1993;31 Suppl 2:S194-8.

PMID:8453697
Abstract

The response of ifosfamide-based chemotherapeutic regimens was retrospectively analyzed in adult patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma who were treated at the West German Tumor Center, Essen, between 1978 and 1990. Single-agent ifosfamide was given either in split doses of 60-80 mg/kg by 4-h infusion over 5 days or as a continuous 24-h infusion of 5 g/m2. Ifosfamide was given either in split doses of 40-50 mg/kg over 5 days or as a continuous infusion of 5 g/m2 in combination with doxorubicin (40-60 mg/m2, day 1), cisplatin (20 mg/m2, days 1-5), or etoposide (100 mg/m2, days 1, 3, and 5). Mesna was given to all patients as prophylaxis against urotoxicity. Of 54 evaluable patients receiving single-agent ifosfamide, 5 achieved a complete response (CR) and 10 showed a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 28%. Objective responses were more frequent in previously untreated patients (47%) than in pretreated patients (15%; P < 0.01). The addition of doxorubicin (n = 41) or cisplatin (n = 29) to ifosfamide did not significantly increase the response rate (29% and 41%, respectively) or median duration of remission as compared with ifosfamide alone. In addition, no significant difference was observed between the two ifosfamide regimens used: the 24-h continuous-infusion schedule (5 g/m2 per course, 27% response rate) and the 5-day fractionated regimen (10-15 g/m2 per course, 19% response rate). We conclude that the response and the median duration of remission produced by single-agent ifosfamide compare favorably with the results achieved using single-agent doxorubicin and the usually more toxic combination regimens.

摘要

对1978年至1990年间在埃森的西德肿瘤中心接受治疗的晚期软组织肉瘤成年患者中基于异环磷酰胺的化疗方案的反应进行了回顾性分析。单药异环磷酰胺给药方式为:分剂量60 - 80mg/kg,5天内4小时输注完毕;或持续24小时输注5g/m²。异环磷酰胺给药方式也可为:分剂量40 - 50mg/kg,5天内输注完毕;或持续输注5g/m²,并联合多柔比星(40 - 60mg/m²,第1天)、顺铂(20mg/m²,第1 - 5天)或依托泊苷(100mg/m²,第1、3和5天)。所有患者均给予美司钠以预防尿路毒性。在54例接受单药异环磷酰胺治疗的可评估患者中,5例达到完全缓解(CR),10例显示部分缓解(PR),总缓解率为28%。既往未治疗患者的客观缓解率(47%)高于既往接受过治疗的患者(15%;P < 0.01)。与单药异环磷酰胺相比,异环磷酰胺联合多柔比星(n = 41)或顺铂(n = 29)并未显著提高缓解率(分别为29%和41%)或中位缓解持续时间。此外,所使用的两种异环磷酰胺方案之间未观察到显著差异:24小时持续输注方案(每疗程5g/m²,缓解率27%)和5天分次给药方案(每疗程10 - 15g/m²,缓解率19%)。我们得出结论,单药异环磷酰胺产生的缓解效果和中位缓解持续时间与单药多柔比星以及通常毒性更大的联合方案所取得的结果相比具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验