Clark S A, Bennett E S, Henry V A, Caroline P J
University of Missouri-St. Louis, School of Optometry 63121.
J Am Optom Assoc. 1993 Mar;64(3):169-74.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of one abrasive cleaner, one non-abrasive cleaner and one non-abrasive alcohol-based cleaner on the lens parameter stability of the NOVALENS. Twenty-four lenses, all NOVALENS material of identical design, were cleaned 100 times each. Eight lenses were cleaned with MiraFlow (CIBA Vision), eight lenses with Optic-Free Daily Cleaner and eight lenses with the Gas Permeable Daily Cleaner (PBH). The base curve radius, center thickness and power were verified immediately before, immediately after and (per manufacturer's recommendation) 4 hours after cleaning at baseline, 25, 50, 75 and 100 cleanings. Lens toricity of approximately 0.50D was found with all three cleaners after 100 cleanings. No change in lens power or center thickness was found. It was concluded that extreme care must be taken in handling the NOVALENS due to the potential of induced warpage.
本研究的目的是评估一种磨砂清洁剂、一种非磨砂清洁剂和一种非磨砂酒精基清洁剂对NOVALENS镜片参数稳定性的影响。二十四片镜片,均为设计相同的NOVALENS材料,每片镜片各清洁100次。八片镜片用MiraFlow(CIBA Vision)清洁,八片镜片用Optic-Free Daily Cleaner清洁,八片镜片用透气日抛清洁剂(PBH)清洁。在基线、25次、50次、75次和100次清洁时,分别在清洁前、清洁后立即以及(根据制造商建议)清洁后4小时对镜片的基弧半径、中心厚度和屈光度进行验证。在100次清洁后,使用这三种清洁剂均发现镜片散光约为0.50D。未发现镜片屈光度或中心厚度有变化。研究得出结论,由于NOVALENS镜片存在诱发翘曲的可能性,因此在处理时必须格外小心。