Zubialde J P, Lawler F, Clemenson N
Department of Family Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73104.
J Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;36(3):271-80.
Epidemiologic data are accumulating that suggest that postmenopausal estrogen therapy reduces the risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD). Computer simulation by Markov analysis can be applied to current data to estimate the increase in life expectancy obtained from postmenopausal estrogen use and compare them with benefits from other therapies for CAD risk reduction. Decision-analysis techniques can also examine whether the benefits of unopposed estrogen regimens ever exceed those of combination therapy.
In our analysis, hypothetical cohorts of postmenopausal women age 50 and 65 years with intact uteri were assigned either to estrogen and progesterone therapy or unopposed estrogens. The subjects were also defined by risk category for CAD. Outcomes were measured in terms of life expectancy for treatment cohorts compared with identical untreated cohorts.
Life expectancy benefits in combined therapy groups were found to be very substantial for all CAD risk categories. Cohorts who began therapy at age 50 years showed benefits ranging from 0.3 years of additional life for those at low risk of developing CAD to 2.3 years for those at high risk. Even though the addition of progestins may theoretically result in reduction of overall CAD benefits, impressive gains in life expectancy were still found even when a 40% reduction in estrogenic effect was considered. Overall, benefits were very favorable when compared with other accepted strategies for CAD risk reduction. Little additional benefit was found to justify use of unopposed estrogens given the potential added mortality from endometrial cancer.
Substantial increases in life expectancy may result from postmenopausal estrogen therapy. These may be equal to or possibly greater than benefits from other well-recognized risk-reduction strategies. Little advantage in additional life expectancy is found to justify use of unopposed estrogens.
越来越多的流行病学数据表明,绝经后雌激素治疗可降低患冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的风险。通过马尔可夫分析进行的计算机模拟可应用于当前数据,以估计绝经后使用雌激素所带来的预期寿命增加,并将其与其他降低CAD风险的疗法的益处进行比较。决策分析技术还可以研究单纯雌激素疗法的益处是否曾超过联合疗法。
在我们的分析中,将50岁和65岁子宫完好的绝经后女性假设队列分为接受雌激素加孕激素治疗或单纯雌激素治疗。这些受试者也根据CAD风险类别进行定义。通过将治疗队列的预期寿命与相同的未治疗队列进行比较来衡量结果。
发现联合治疗组对所有CAD风险类别都有非常显著的预期寿命益处。50岁开始治疗的队列显示,低CAD发病风险者的额外寿命增加0.3年,高风险者增加2.3年。尽管从理论上讲添加孕激素可能会降低总体CAD益处,但即使考虑到雌激素作用降低40%,仍发现预期寿命有显著增加。总体而言,与其他公认的降低CAD风险策略相比,益处非常可观。鉴于子宫内膜癌可能增加的死亡率,未发现使用单纯雌激素有额外益处。
绝经后雌激素治疗可能会使预期寿命大幅增加。这些增加可能等于或可能大于其他公认的风险降低策略的益处。未发现使用单纯雌激素在额外预期寿命方面有什么优势。