Ruggenenti P, Perico N, Mosconi L, Gaspari F, Benigni A, Amuchastegui C S, Bruzzi I, Remuzzi G
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Italy.
Kidney Int. 1993 Mar;43(3):706-11. doi: 10.1038/ki.1993.101.
Renal toxicity, possibly due to vasoconstriction and vascular injury, is the most relevant side-effect of chronic cyclosporine (CsA) therapy given to prevent graft rejection. In kidney transplant recipients each oral dose of CsA is invariably followed by a transient reduction in renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) that results from a form of acute reversible hypoperfusion. We sought to determine whether the Ca2+ channel blocker, lacidipine, prevented CsA-associated renal hypoperfusion in these patients. Parallel studies on CsA pharmacokinetics, renal function parameters (GFR and RPF), as inulin and p-aminohippurate (PAH) clearances, respectively, and urinary excretion of the vasoconstrictor endothelin in 10 consecutive renal transplant patients given CsA as a part of their immunosuppressive therapy were performed. Patients were studied at different time intervals after CsA alone, CsA and lacidipine (4 mg/day), and again seven days after lacidipine withdrawal. In all patients basal RPF and GFR declined on average 51% (139.3 +/- 20.7 ml/min/1.73 m2) and 50% (32.5 +/- 5.8 ml/min/1.73 m2), respectively, two to four hours after maximum blood CsA concentration was reached. As blood levels of CsA returned to trough, both parameters progressively increased to baseline. Lacidipine administration completely prevented the fall in RPF (pre-CsA: 277.1 +/- 23.6; 6 hr post-CsA: 304.5 +/- 31.1 ml/min/1.73 m2) and GFR (pre-CsA: 66.6 +/- 8.1; 6 hr post-CsA: 70.1 +/- 9.8 ml/min/1.73 m2). When lacidipine treatment was discontinued the abnormal RPF and GFR response to CsA administration was again observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
肾毒性可能是由于血管收缩和血管损伤所致,是慢性环孢素(CsA)治疗预防移植排斥反应时最相关的副作用。在肾移植受者中,每次口服CsA后,肾血浆流量(RPF)和肾小球滤过率(GFR)都会出现短暂下降,这是一种急性可逆性低灌注形式导致的。我们试图确定钙通道阻滞剂拉西地平是否能预防这些患者中与CsA相关的肾灌注不足。对10例连续接受CsA作为免疫抑制治疗一部分的肾移植患者进行了平行研究,分别涉及CsA药代动力学、肾功能参数(GFR和RPF),即菊粉和对氨基马尿酸(PAH)清除率,以及血管收缩剂内皮素的尿排泄。在单独使用CsA、CsA与拉西地平(4mg/天)联合使用后不同时间间隔对患者进行研究,并在停用拉西地平7天后再次研究。在所有患者中,达到最大血CsA浓度后两到四小时,基础RPF和GFR平均分别下降51%(139.3±20.7ml/min/1.73m²)和50%(32.5±5.8ml/min/1.73m²)。随着CsA血药浓度降至谷值,这两个参数逐渐恢复至基线水平。给予拉西地平可完全预防RPF(CsA前:277.1±23.6;CsA后6小时:304.5±31.1ml/min/1.73m²)和GFR(CsA前:66.6±8.1;CsA后6小时:70.1±9.8ml/min/1.73m²)的下降。停用拉西地平治疗后,再次观察到对CsA给药的RPF和GFR异常反应。(摘要截取自250字)