Suppr超能文献

成本核算服务:比较三种静脉给药系统

Costing services: comparing three i.v. medication systems.

作者信息

Baker K, Evans C B, Tiburzi T, Nolan M T, Frost G L, Kokoski P, Arrington D M

出版信息

Nurs Manage. 1993 Mar;24(3):56-60.

PMID:8455896
Abstract

Three methods of intermittent intravenous (IV) medication delivery were studied for evidence of cost effectiveness. Eighty-five patients receiving antibiotics on two general medicine units were examined over an eight-week period. Chi square analysis revealed no significant differences in the number of IV complications among the three delivery systems. ANOVA revealed no significant differences among the three systems. A cost savings of $99.70 per patient using the Bard system and $98.60 using the BD system was realized. Thirty-six (88%) of the nurses preferred a syringe pump system, 10 patients showed no strong preference for any of the methods, and the two pharmacists preferred a syringe delivery system.

摘要

研究了三种间歇性静脉注射给药方法的成本效益证据。在八周时间内对两个普通内科病房中接受抗生素治疗的85名患者进行了检查。卡方分析显示,三种给药系统在静脉并发症数量上无显著差异。方差分析显示,三种系统之间无显著差异。使用巴德系统每位患者节省成本99.70美元,使用BD系统节省成本98.60美元。36名(88%)护士更喜欢使用注射泵系统,10名患者对任何一种方法都没有强烈偏好,两名药剂师更喜欢使用注射器给药系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验