• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种注射泵输注系统的成本与可接受性

Cost and acceptability of three syringe-pump infusion systems.

作者信息

Johnson M S, Pesko L J, Wood C F, Reinders T P

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Services, Medical College of Virginia Hospitals (MCVH), Richmond 23298-0001.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Aug;47(8):1794-8.

PMID:2389788
Abstract

The fiscal impact and acceptability of implementing a syringe-pump infusion system at a 900-bed university teaching hospital where the minibag system has been in use is reported. Researchers selected three models of syringe pumps for evaluation: the Bard Harvard Mini-Infuser 150XL, the Becton Dickinson 360 Infuser, and the Strato Stratofuse System. Each pump was evaluated for three weeks on a medical-surgical unit and a hematology-oncology unit. Drugs to be infused were chosen after a literature review to determine which drugs had been successfully infused via syringe pump; 22 formulary medications were selected. Syringes were prepared as singly packaged doses or as doses prepared in bulk and packaged frozen. Control of the syringe pumps and microbore tubing was assigned to the inpatient pharmacy staff. Nurses and pharmacy personnel were apprised of the study and taught how to use the syringe pumps. Time-and-motion studies were performed in the sterile products preparation area, and a cost analysis was done. Nurses preferred syringe pumps over the minibag system because the pumps reduced the nursing time needed to infuse a drug, administered less fluid, provided consistent infusion rates, had alarms, and were relatively easy to use. The time required to prepare syringes did not differ substantially among syringe-pump models. It was estimated that using any of the evaluated pumps in place of the minibag system would save $126,500 during the three-year period 1988-91, primarily because of differences in the cost of disposable items. The syringe-pump infusion system is an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to the minibag system.

摘要

报告了在一家拥有900张床位且一直在使用小袋输液系统的大学教学医院实施注射器泵输液系统的财政影响和可接受性。研究人员选择了三种型号的注射器泵进行评估:巴德哈佛迷你注射器150XL、贝克顿·迪金森360注射器和斯特拉托斯特拉托弗斯系统。每个泵在一个内科-外科病房和一个血液肿瘤病房进行了为期三周的评估。在查阅文献以确定哪些药物已通过注射器泵成功输注后,选择了要输注的药物;共选择了22种处方药物。注射器准备为单包装剂量或批量准备并冷冻包装的剂量。注射器泵和微管的控制工作分配给住院药房工作人员。向护士和药房人员介绍了该研究,并教授了如何使用注射器泵。在无菌产品制备区域进行了时间和动作研究,并进行了成本分析。护士们更喜欢注射器泵而不是小袋输液系统,因为泵减少了输注药物所需的护理时间,输注的液体更少,提供了一致的输注速率,有警报,并且相对易于使用。不同型号的注射器泵准备注射器所需的时间没有显著差异。据估计,在1988年至1991年的三年期间,使用任何一种评估过的泵代替小袋输液系统将节省126,500美元,主要是因为一次性用品成本的差异。注射器泵输液系统是小袋输液系统可接受且具有成本效益的替代方案。

相似文献

1
Cost and acceptability of three syringe-pump infusion systems.三种注射泵输注系统的成本与可接受性
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Aug;47(8):1794-8.
2
A financial evaluation of the Becton Dickinson 360 infuser system.
Hosp Pharm. 1987 Jun;22(6):563-6.
3
Evaluation of a multiple-dose syringe pump system for intermittent i.v. drug delivery.用于间歇性静脉给药的多剂量注射泵系统的评估。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Oct;43(10):2474-8.
4
A cost comparison of intravenous cimetidine delivery systems.静脉注射西咪替丁给药系统的成本比较。
Hosp Pharm. 1990 Dec;25(12):1085-9.
5
Pharmacy-initiated implementation of a syringe pump infusion system.药房发起的注射泵输注系统实施。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Mar;42(3):584-7.
6
Costing services: comparing three i.v. medication systems.成本核算服务:比较三种静脉给药系统
Nurs Manage. 1993 Mar;24(3):56-60.
7
Conversion from minibags to mini-infuser syringe pumps.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Oct;43(5):243-5.
8
Cost comparison of two systems for intermittent intravenous administration of small-volume injections.两种小容量注射剂间歇性静脉给药系统的成本比较
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Feb;42(2):323-8.
9
Implementation and cost analysis of a syringe pump system for intermittent i.v. drug delivery.间歇性静脉给药注射器泵系统的实施与成本分析
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Mar;42(3):581-4.
10
Syringes versus minibags as an intravenous admixture system: a comparison of cost and nursing preference.注射器与微型袋作为静脉内混合系统的比较:成本与护理偏好对比
Can J Hosp Pharm. 1987 Jun;40(3):81-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct costs of intravenous delivery systems.静脉输液系统的直接成本。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Jul;4(1):8-13. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304010-00003.
2
Comparison of costs linked to the preparation and administration of fluorouracil as a continuous infusion based on three techniques.基于三种技术的氟尿嘧啶持续输注制剂及给药相关成本的比较。
Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1992 Dec 11;14(6):357-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01970172.