Suppr超能文献

将不适当给予溶栓治疗的风险降至最低(心肌梗死溶栓与血管成形术 [TAMI] 研究组)。

Minimizing the risk of inappropriately administering thrombolytic therapy (Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction [TAMI] study group).

作者信息

Chapman G D, Ohman E M, Topol E J, Candela R J, Kereiakes D J, Samaha J, Berrios E, Pieper K S, Young S Y, Califf R M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1993 Apr 1;71(10):783-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90824-v.

Abstract

Despite the proven benefits of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction, concern for its complications, especially in patients misdiagnosed with myocardial infarction, has led to hesitancy in its use. Historical, clinical and electrocardiographic criteria were developed for enrolling patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction into thrombolytic trials by noncardiovascular specialists. The incidence of misdiagnosis of myocardial infarction and the clinical outcomes when these criteria were used were evaluated for 1,387 consecutive patients given thrombolytic therapy. Twenty-five community hospitals and 7 interventional centers were the sites of enrollment. Most patients (63%) were enrolled from community hospitals. Criteria for thrombolytic therapy included: symptoms of acute myocardial infarction < 6 hours but > 20 minutes, and not relieved by nitroglycerin; and ST-segment elevation > or = 1 mm in 2 contiguous leads or ST-segment depression of posterior myocardial infarction. Exclusion criteria reflecting increased risk of bleeding were used. A final diagnosis of myocardial infarction was based on creatinine kinase-MB, electrocardiographic and ventriculographic evaluation. Acute myocardial infarction was misdiagnosed in 20 patients (1.4%; 95% confidence interval 0.8-2.0%). These patients were demographically similar to those with acute myocardial infarction. All misdiagnosed patients survived; no significant adverse events occurred. Thus, in several clinical settings, a simple algorithm with specific criteria was used for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction and administering thrombolytic therapy. The inclusion criteria used in this study led to a low rate of misdiagnosis.

摘要

尽管溶栓治疗在急性心肌梗死中已被证实具有益处,但对其并发症的担忧,尤其是在被误诊为心肌梗死的患者中,导致了在使用溶栓治疗时的犹豫不决。非心血管专科医生制定了历史、临床和心电图标准,用于将疑似急性心肌梗死患者纳入溶栓试验。对连续接受溶栓治疗的1387例患者评估了心肌梗死误诊的发生率以及使用这些标准时的临床结局。25家社区医院和7个介入中心为入组地点。大多数患者(63%)来自社区医院。溶栓治疗的标准包括:急性心肌梗死症状持续时间<6小时但>20分钟,且硝酸甘油不能缓解;以及2个相邻导联ST段抬高≥1mm或后壁心肌梗死ST段压低。使用了反映出血风险增加的排除标准。心肌梗死的最终诊断基于肌酸激酶-MB、心电图和心室造影评估。20例患者(1.4%;95%置信区间0.8 - 2.0%)被误诊为急性心肌梗死。这些患者在人口统计学特征上与急性心肌梗死患者相似。所有误诊患者均存活;未发生重大不良事件。因此,在几种临床情况下,使用了一种具有特定标准的简单算法来诊断急性心肌梗死并进行溶栓治疗。本研究中使用的纳入标准导致误诊率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验