Effects of fenofibrate on angiographically examined coronary atherosclerosis and left ventricular function in hypercholesterolemic patients.

Within the framework of a prospective lipid-lowering intervention study 44 patients were treated over a period of 3 years with a lipid-lowering diet and 200-400 mg fenofibrate daily. The intervention led to statistically significant decreases in total cholesterol (Chol), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-Chol) and triglycerides levels, and to a significant increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-Chol) levels. Despite intervention, in 8 patients the HDL-Chol levels decreased by up to 20 mg/dl, where these were mainly patients with high initial values. Likewise, the triglycerides of 4 patients whose initial levels were relatively low increased (up to 49 mg/dl) and the LDL-Chol levels of 8 patients whose initial levels were also low increased (up to 49 mg/dl). Only minor success was achieved through the 6-week diet, but this was still slightly significant for Chol and LDL-Chol levels. A total of 21 patients underwent repeat angiography within 3 years for clinical reasons. For the evaluation of the angiographic progress a total of 98 minor and moderate stenoses was measured using digital image processing and automatic contour finding. The change in the angiographic parameters 'percent diameter reduction' (%DR) and 'percent plaque area' (%PA) correlated with on-treatment LDL-Chol levels (%DR change with LDL-Chol: r = 0.67, P = 0.0005; %DR change with Chol: r = 0.61, P = 0.002; %PA change with LDL-Chol: r = 0.40, P = 0.037; %PA change with Chol: r = 0.38, P = 0.044), while for HDL-Chol and triglycerides no influence on the angiographic progress could be demonstrated. On the basis of the reproducibility of the measuring methods the patients were classified in the categories 'regression', 'unchanged' and 'progression'. The patients classified as 'regression' (parameter: %DR change) showed an LDL-Chol mean value of 162 +/- 9 mg/dl, whereas those classified as 'unchanged' or 'progression' showed values of 189 +/- 25 mg/dl and 199 +/- 21 mg/dl, respectively (P = 0.014). A negative correlation appeared between the angiographic progress parameters and the initial degree of stenosis. The left ventricular ejection fraction in the second angiography showed relationships to lipoprotein levels and angiographic progress parameters.