• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聋人语义习惯的人格相关性。

Personality correlates of semantic habits in the deaf.

作者信息

Chen K, Monsalud A

出版信息

J Psychol. 1977 Mar;95(2d Half):305-7. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1977.9915894.

DOI:10.1080/00223980.1977.9915894
PMID:845838
Abstract

The relationships between personality characteristics and semantic habits were explored with use of The Sixteen Personality Factory Questionnaire, Form E, and a measure of semantic habits. Ss were 102 deaf male and female college students. The results, analyzed separately by sex, showed a few significant relationships. Deaf males who were emotionally less stable and affected by feelings tended to prefer positive and negative evaluations. Relaxed, tranquil, and unfrustrated deaf males tended to neglect positive and negative evaluations and to prefer categorical responses to detail ones. Serious and sober deaf females tended to neglect negative evaluations.

摘要

使用《卡特尔十六种人格因素问卷》E 式以及一种语义习惯测量方法,对人格特征与语义习惯之间的关系进行了探究。研究对象为 102 名聋哑男女大学生。按性别分别进行分析的结果显示出一些显著关系。情绪不太稳定且易受情绪影响的聋哑男性往往更喜欢积极和消极评价。轻松、平静且无挫败感的聋哑男性往往会忽视积极和消极评价,而更喜欢对细节的分类反应。严肃且冷静的聋哑女性往往会忽视消极评价。

相似文献

1
Personality correlates of semantic habits in the deaf.聋人语义习惯的人格相关性。
J Psychol. 1977 Mar;95(2d Half):305-7. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1977.9915894.
2
Deaf college students' perceptions of their social-emotional adjustment.聋人大学生对自身社会情感调适的认知。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007 Fall;12(4):486-94. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm008. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
3
Extremity of semantic differential ratings in deaf and hearing subjects.聋人和听力正常受试者语义差异评分的极值。
J Gen Psychol. 1977 Apr;96(2d Half):231-6. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1977.9920819.
4
Semantic and pragmatic factors influencing deaf and hearing students' comprehension of english sentences containing numeral quantifiers.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Fall;16(4):419-36. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enr013. Epub 2011 May 4.
5
Print exposure, reading habits, and reading achievement among deaf and hearing college students.聋人与听力正常的大学生的印刷品接触、阅读习惯及阅读成绩
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2012 Winter;17(1):61-74. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enr044. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
6
SEMANTIC HABITS AND COGNITIVE STYLE PROCESSES IN THE DEAF.聋人的语义习惯与认知风格过程
J Abnorm Psychol. 1964 Apr;68:397-402. doi: 10.1037/h0042815.
7
A contrast of the personality structure of college students found in the questionnaire medium by items as compared to parcels.通过问卷中项目与分量表对大学生人格结构进行的对比。
J Genet Psychol. 1974 Dec;125(2d Half):219-24. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1974.10533210.
8
Semantic categorization: a comparison between deaf and hearing children.语义分类:聋童与听力正常儿童的比较
J Commun Disord. 2010 Sep-Oct;43(5):347-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
9
Success with academic English: reflections of deaf college students.学术英语的成功:聋人大学生的反思
Am Ann Deaf. 2002 Mar;147(1):5-23. doi: 10.1353/aad.2012.0184.
10
Visual spatial representation in mathematical problem solving by deaf and hearing students.聋生和听力正常学生在数学问题解决中的视觉空间表征
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007 Fall;12(4):432-48. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm022. Epub 2007 Jun 4.