• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聋人和听力正常受试者语义差异评分的极值。

Extremity of semantic differential ratings in deaf and hearing subjects.

作者信息

Chen K C

出版信息

J Gen Psychol. 1977 Apr;96(2d Half):231-6. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1977.9920819.

DOI:10.1080/00221309.1977.9920819
PMID:864438
Abstract

A comparison was made separately by sex of 19 deaf and 19 hearing Ss on mean semantic differential ratings of contradictory concept-pairs. There were nine deaf males, 10 deaf females, 11 hearing males, and eight hearing females with mean ages of 23.00, 21.90, 20.73, and 19.75, respectively. It was hypothesized that the deaf would make less extreme ratings of concept-pairs than hearing Ss and that they would shift their ratings of contradictory concept-pairs closer to the mean of the original ratings of the single concepts comprising the pairs. It was found that both predictions were true only for deaf males. Deaf females did not differ from hearing Ss.

摘要

分别按性别对19名失聪受试者和19名听力正常受试者在矛盾概念对的平均语义差异评分上进行了比较。其中有9名失聪男性、10名失聪女性、11名听力正常男性和8名听力正常女性,平均年龄分别为23.00岁、21.90岁、20.73岁和19.75岁。研究假设,与听力正常的受试者相比,失聪者对概念对的评分不会那么极端,并且他们会将对矛盾概念对的评分更接近构成这些概念对的单个概念原始评分的平均值。结果发现,只有失聪男性的这两个预测是正确的。失聪女性与听力正常的受试者没有差异。

相似文献

1
Extremity of semantic differential ratings in deaf and hearing subjects.聋人和听力正常受试者语义差异评分的极值。
J Gen Psychol. 1977 Apr;96(2d Half):231-6. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1977.9920819.
2
Deaf college students' perceptions of their social-emotional adjustment.聋人大学生对自身社会情感调适的认知。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007 Fall;12(4):486-94. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm008. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
3
Personality correlates of semantic habits in the deaf.聋人语义习惯的人格相关性。
J Psychol. 1977 Mar;95(2d Half):305-7. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1977.9915894.
4
The attainment of formal operations: a comparison of probability concepts in deaf and hearing adolescents.形式运算的达成:聋人与听力正常青少年概率概念的比较
Genet Psychol Monogr. 1975 Feb;91(First half):61-119.
5
Acoustic image in visual detection for deaf and hearing college students.
J Gen Psychol. 1976 Apr;94(2d Half):243-6. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1976.9711612.
6
Evaluative understanding and role-taking ability: a comparison of deaf and hearing children.评价性理解与角色采择能力:聋哑儿童与听力正常儿童的比较
Child Dev. 1983 Feb;54(1):141-7.
7
The effect of congenital deafness on duration judgment.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;47(9):946-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01591.x.
8
Hearing, deaf, and hard-of-hearing Israeli adolescents' evaluations of deaf men and deaf women's occupational competence.听力正常、失聪及听力障碍的以色列青少年对失聪男性和失聪女性职业能力的评价。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005 Fall;10(4):376-89. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eni045. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
9
Genetic selection for deafness: the views of hearing children of deaf adults.遗传性耳聋选择:聋人成年子女的观点。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Dec;35(12):722-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.030429.
10
Deaf and hearing adults' recollections of childhood and beyond.
Memory. 2000 Sep;8(5):293-309. doi: 10.1080/09658210050117726.