Suppr超能文献

预防噪声性听力损失:长期“适应性训练”是否必要?

Protection from noise induced hearing loss: is prolonged 'conditioning' necessary?

作者信息

Subramaniam M, Henderson D, Spongr V P

机构信息

Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo.

出版信息

Hear Res. 1993 Feb;65(1-2):234-9. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90216-n.

Abstract

The effect of prior 'conditioning' noise exposures on the protection from subsequent higher level exposures was studied using four groups of chinchillas. The three experimental groups were 'conditioned' using a 0.5 kHz octave band noise at 95 dB SPL for 6 h a day. The first group was exposed to the noise once and allowed to recover for nine days prior to the second exposure. The second and third groups were exposed for ten and twenty days respectively. The first group showed only small reductions in threshold shift (TS) following the second exposure. The other two groups showed significant reductions in TS with repeated exposures. Following the last 'conditioning' exposure, all three experimental groups were allowed to recover for five days before exposing them to the same noise at 106 dB SPL for 48 h. Threshold shifts recorded following the 106 dB exposure were compared against those recorded in a control group exposed only to the higher level. Each of the three experimental groups developed significantly less permanent threshold shifts than the control group. However, there were no significant differences among the three experimental groups and the differences in hair cell losses were insignificant.

摘要

使用四组龙猫研究了先前的“预处理”噪声暴露对后续更高水平暴露的防护效果。三个实验组每天使用95 dB SPL的0.5 kHz倍频程带噪声进行6小时的“预处理”。第一组暴露于噪声一次,在第二次暴露前允许恢复九天。第二组和第三组分别暴露十天和二十天。第一组在第二次暴露后阈值偏移(TS)仅略有降低。其他两组随着重复暴露TS显著降低。在最后一次“预处理”暴露后,所有三个实验组都被允许恢复五天,然后将它们暴露于106 dB SPL的相同噪声中48小时。将106 dB暴露后记录的阈值偏移与仅暴露于更高水平的对照组中记录的值进行比较。三个实验组中的每一组产生的永久性阈值偏移均明显低于对照组。然而,三个实验组之间没有显著差异,并且毛细胞损失的差异不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验