Förster R, Pillasch J, Zielke A, Malewski U, Rothmund M
Department of General Surgery, Phillips-University Marburg, Federal Republic of Germany.
J Trauma. 1993 Feb;34(2):264-9.
The validity of routine ultrasonography (US) in the evaluation of patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) was investigated in a prospective study. From April 1989 to April 1990, 140 patients with suspected BAT were included in this study. Ultrasonography was performed by 17 surgeons using a standardized technique. The influence of the investigators' experience in US was manifested in the positive predictive value (PPV). Surgeons with a learning period of less than 1 year had a PPV of 60%. Investigators with experience of more than 1 year but less than 3 years had a PPV of 76%. For the most experienced investigators (> 3 years) a PPV of 92% was recorded. The sensitivity for intra-abdominal lesions was 100%, 100%, and 92%, and the specificity 94%, 89%, and 98% for the three levels of experience, respectively. We conclude that US is a suitable test for screening patients with BAT since it is highly sensitive, highly specific, complication free, and easy to learn. The positive findings of surgeons who are learning to use this method should be verified by reinvestigation by an experienced sonographer, by diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), or by a CT scan if the patient is hemodynamically stable.
一项前瞻性研究调查了常规超声检查(US)在评估钝性腹部创伤(BAT)患者中的有效性。从1989年4月至1990年4月,140例疑似BAT患者纳入本研究。17名外科医生采用标准化技术进行超声检查。研究者超声检查经验对阳性预测值(PPV)有影响。学习期少于1年的外科医生PPV为60%。经验超过1年但少于3年的研究者PPV为76%。经验最丰富(超过3年)的研究者PPV为92%。对于三个经验水平的研究者,腹部内病变的敏感性分别为100%、100%和92%,特异性分别为94%、89%和98%。我们得出结论,超声检查是筛查BAT患者的合适检查方法,因为它高度敏感、高度特异、无并发症且易于学习。正在学习使用该方法的外科医生的阳性检查结果,若患者血流动力学稳定,应由经验丰富的超声检查医师复查、通过诊断性腹腔灌洗(DPL)或通过CT扫描来验证。