Suppr超能文献

斯克拉失语症量表的效度。

Validity of the Sklar Aphasia Scale.

作者信息

Cohen R, Engel D, Kelter S, List G, Strohner H

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1977 Mar;20(1):146-54. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2001.146.

Abstract

A German version of the Sklar Aphasia Scale (SAS) was administered to groups of fluent aphasics, nonfluent aphasics, and three control groups (brain-damaged patients without aphasia, schizophrenics, and normal subjects). The SAS discriminated fluent and nonfluent aphasics from schizophrenic brain-damaged, and normal control subjects with a high level of confidence; 91.8% of the aphasic and 81.5% of the brain-damaged patients without aphasia were correctly classified. However, the SAS did not discriminate between fluent and nonfluent aphasics. A factor analysis, which also included the subtests of the Token Test and eight other variables, showed the SAS and the Token Test to load mainly on the same general factor, which represents the severity of language disorders or the impairment of those left-hemisphere functions that might be basic to language. Subtests II and IV of the SAS also had loadings on a memory factor, but none of the subtests had variance on the third factor which represented the sensory-motor or fluency/nonfluencey dimension.

摘要

对流利性失语症患者组、非流利性失语症患者组以及三个对照组(无失语症的脑损伤患者、精神分裂症患者和正常受试者)进行了德语版的斯克拉失语症量表(SAS)测试。SAS能够高度准确地区分流利性失语症患者和非流利性失语症患者与精神分裂症患者、脑损伤患者及正常对照受试者;91.8%的失语症患者和81.5%的无失语症脑损伤患者被正确分类。然而,SAS无法区分流利性失语症患者和非流利性失语症患者。一项因素分析,其中还包括代币测试的子测试和其他八个变量,结果显示SAS和代币测试主要加载在同一个一般因素上,该因素代表语言障碍的严重程度或那些可能是语言基础的左半球功能的损伤。SAS的子测试II和IV也加载在一个记忆因素上,但没有一个子测试在代表感觉运动或流利性/非流利性维度的第三个因素上有方差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验