Dohrn C S, Lichtor J L, Coalson D W, Uitvlugt A, de Wit H, Zacny J P
Department of Psychology, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, IL 60637.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993 Feb;31(3):265-80. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(93)90009-f.
The subjective, psychomotor and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide at subanesthetic doses (30% and 40% in oxygen) were determined in normal healthy volunteers using a choice paradigm. Thirty percent nitrous oxide was chosen no more often than oxygen (41.6% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was no more reinforcing than oxygen inhalation. Forty percent nitrous oxide was chosen significantly less often than oxygen (22% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was less reinforcing than oxygen. Nitrous oxide produced robust subjective effects (e.g., increased ratings of 'high,' 'tingling,' and 'dizzy'). Subjects who chose nitrous oxide reported pleasant subjective effects and liked it, while those who chose placebo reported unpleasant subjective effects and disliked it. Both concentrations of nitrous oxide impaired psychomotor performance in all subjects. The lack of reinforcing effects noted in the present study, given nitrous oxide's known abuse potential, is discussed.
使用选择范式在正常健康志愿者中确定了亚麻醉剂量(氧气中30%和40%)一氧化二氮的主观、精神运动和强化作用。30%的一氧化二氮被选择的频率并不比氧气高(选择率为41.6%),这表明,对于大多数受试对象而言,长时间吸入该浓度的一氧化二氮并不比吸入氧气更具强化作用。40%的一氧化二氮被选择的频率显著低于氧气(选择率为22%),这表明,对于大多数受试对象而言,长时间吸入该浓度的一氧化二氮比吸入氧气的强化作用更小。一氧化二氮产生了强烈的主观效应(例如,“兴奋”“刺痛”和“头晕”评分增加)。选择一氧化二氮的受试者报告了愉悦的主观效应并喜欢它,而选择安慰剂的受试者报告了不愉快的主观效应并不喜欢它。两种浓度的一氧化二氮均损害了所有受试者的精神运动表现。鉴于一氧化二氮已知的滥用可能性,对本研究中观察到的缺乏强化作用进行了讨论。