Wilson S M, McNerney R, Nye P M, Godfrey-Faussett P D, Stoker N G, Voller A
Department of Clinical Sciences, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):776-82. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.776-782.1993.
The complexity, expense, and susceptibility to contamination of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are all issues which need to be overcome if PCR is to be used outside of research laboratories. We addressed these problems with respect to the diagnosis of tuberculosis. First, we simplified the procedure for extracting Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA from sputum samples. Two methods of sample preparation were compared: the chaotrope-silica method and a novel, more simple chloroform method. Second, we developed a colorimetric method for product detection. This method was as sensitive and specific as agarose gel electrophoresis for detection of PCR product. By using a one-tube nested protocol, 5 to 50 genome equivalents of M. tuberculosis DNA were detected. The simplified colorimetric PCR was compared with microscopy and culture for detection of M. tuberculosis in clinical specimens of sputum. A total of 171 sputum samples were investigated from 108 patients, 12 of whom were subsequently found to have tuberculosis by culture and/or microscopy. PCR of samples prepared by the chaotrope-silica method had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 100% whereas PCR of samples prepared by the chloroform method had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 99% when compared with the sensitivities and specificities of the combined classical microbiological methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. The simplified colorimetric PCR in combination with the chloroform sample preparation method was at least as sensitive as microscopy but had a greater specificity because samples with atypical mycobacteria were not detected by PCR. The sensitivity of the method for detection of smear-negative and extrapulmonary tuberculosis remains to be investigated.
如果要在研究实验室之外使用聚合酶链反应(PCR),其复杂性、成本以及易受污染性都是需要克服的问题。我们针对结核病诊断解决了这些问题。首先,我们简化了从痰液样本中提取结核分枝杆菌DNA的程序。比较了两种样本制备方法:离液剂 - 硅胶法和一种新颖且更简单的氯仿法。其次,我们开发了一种用于产物检测的比色法。该方法在检测PCR产物时与琼脂糖凝胶电泳一样灵敏且特异。通过使用单管巢式方案,检测到了5至50个结核分枝杆菌DNA基因组当量。将简化的比色PCR与显微镜检查和培养法用于检测痰液临床标本中的结核分枝杆菌进行了比较。共对108例患者的171份痰液样本进行了研究,其中12例随后通过培养和/或显微镜检查被发现患有结核病。与用于结核病诊断的传统微生物学方法联合检测的灵敏度和特异性相比,用离液剂 - 硅胶法制备样本的PCR灵敏度为75%,特异性为100%;而用氯仿法制备样本的PCR灵敏度为92%,特异性为99%。简化的比色PCR与氯仿样本制备方法相结合至少与显微镜检查一样灵敏,但特异性更高,因为PCR未检测到非典型分枝杆菌的样本。该方法检测涂片阴性和肺外结核病的灵敏度仍有待研究。