• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估评定量表效用的清单。

A checklist for evaluating the usefulness of rating scales.

作者信息

Streiner D L

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;38(2):140-8. doi: 10.1177/070674379303800214.

DOI:10.1177/070674379303800214
PMID:8467441
Abstract

Rating scales of various sorts are very useful for both clinical and research purposes. However, they vary greatly regarding their reliability, validity, and utility. This article provides a guide for people who need to evaluate scales, either to incorporate them into their own research or clinical activities, or to determine if the results of studies which use scales are meaningful. The different types of reliability and validity are discussed and guidelines are offered to evaluate how well these were assessed. Finally, other aspects of scales which can affect their usefulness, such as completion time, training, and scoring ease, are discussed.

摘要

各类评定量表对于临床和研究目的都非常有用。然而,它们在可靠性、有效性和实用性方面差异很大。本文为那些需要评估量表的人提供了一份指南,这些人要么将量表纳入自己的研究或临床活动中,要么确定使用量表的研究结果是否有意义。文中讨论了不同类型的信度和效度,并提供了评估这些方面评估得如何的指南。最后,还讨论了量表的其他可能影响其有用性的方面,如完成时间、培训和评分难易程度。

相似文献

1
A checklist for evaluating the usefulness of rating scales.评估评定量表效用的清单。
Can J Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;38(2):140-8. doi: 10.1177/070674379303800214.
2
Standardised rating scales in psychiatry: methodological basis, their possibilities and limitations and descriptions of important rating scales.精神病学中的标准化评定量表:方法学基础、其可能性与局限性以及重要评定量表的描述。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2009;10(1):6-26. doi: 10.1080/15622970802264606.
3
Scales for assessment of diagnosis and severity of mental disorders.精神障碍诊断与严重程度评估量表。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1993;372:1-87.
4
DSM-IV: empirical guidelines from psychometrics.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版:心理测量学的实证指南。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1991 Aug;100(3):308-15. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.100.3.308.
5
Validity and reliability of Structured Interview for Competency Incompetency Assessment Testing and Ranking Inventory.
J Clin Psychol. 1997 Aug;53(5):443-50. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199708)53:5<443::aid-jclp4>3.0.co;2-o.
6
SCAN and the PSE tradition.扫描与PSE传统。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1996 Mar;31(2):50-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00801900.
7
Interrater and observer/self-report correlation of psychopathology in routine clinical practice.
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 1995 Mar;7(1):25-31. doi: 10.3109/10401239509149021.
8
Development of the Riverview Psychiatric Inventory.
Psychiatr Q. 2002 Fall;73(3):249-56. doi: 10.1023/a:1016096923179.
9
A DSM-IV-referenced, adolescent self-report rating scale.一种参照《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版的青少年自评量表。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;41(6):671-9. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200206000-00006.
10
Validity of the computerized DIS for diagnosing psychiatric inpatients.
Can J Psychiatry. 1991 Dec;36(10):728-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating the Traditional Chinese version of the Epilepsy Anxiety Survey Instrument (EASI) in Hong Kong.在香港验证癫痫焦虑调查问卷(EASI)的繁体中文版。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 8;16:1604317. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1604317. eCollection 2025.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the child oral health impact profile-short form 19 (COHIP-SF 19) for Ethiopian schoolchildren.埃塞俄比亚学龄儿童口腔健康影响简表19(COHIP-SF 19)的跨文化适应与心理测量学评估
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 27;25(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06230-9.
3
[Spanish translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the ADTC scale (Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool)].
[ADTC量表(特应性皮炎控制工具)的西班牙语翻译、跨文化改编及验证]
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2024 Jun 28;81(2):285-301. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v81.n2.42369.
4
Assessment of adaptive behavior in people with intellectual disabilities: Design and development of a new test battery.智力障碍者适应性行为评估:一种新测试组合的设计与开发
Heliyon. 2024 May 10;10(10):e31048. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31048. eCollection 2024 May 30.
5
Psychometric Evaluation of a Tablet-Based Tool to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.基于平板电脑的工具检测老年人轻度认知障碍的心理测量学评估:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 19;26:e56883. doi: 10.2196/56883.
6
Otherness measuring scale: design and validation for social sciences.他者性测量量表:社会科学领域的设计与验证
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jan 18;12(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01505-8.
7
Validation of the traditional Chinese version of the diabetes eating problem survey-revised and study of the prevalence of disordered eating patterns in Chinese patients with type 1 DM.糖尿病饮食问题调查修订版中文版的验证及中国 1 型糖尿病患者饮食失调模式的患病率研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 31;23(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04744-6.
8
Methodological Quality of PROMs in Psychosocial Consequences of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.结直肠癌筛查心理社会后果中患者报告结局测量指标的方法学质量:一项系统评价
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2023 Mar 14;14:31-47. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S394247. eCollection 2023.
9
Development and validation of Daycare Anesthesia Satisfaction (DAS) questionnaire to assess patient's satisfaction with daycare anesthesia.日间手术麻醉满意度(DAS)问卷的开发与验证,用于评估患者对日间手术麻醉的满意度。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul-Sep;38(3):474-479. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_563_20. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
10
[Telemedicine: validation of a questionnaire to evaluate the experience of health professionalsTelemedicina: validação de um questionário para avaliar a experiência dos profissionais de saúde].[远程医疗:评估卫生专业人员体验的问卷的验证 远程医学:评估卫生专业人员体验的问卷的验证]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 Oct 25;46:e173. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.173. eCollection 2022.