Suppr超能文献

加拿大背景下的塔拉索夫案:温登案与保护义务

Tarasoff in the Canadian context: Wenden and the duty to protect.

作者信息

Truscott D, Crook K H

机构信息

Workers' Compensation Board of Alberta, Rehabilitation Centre, Edmonton.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;38(2):84-9. doi: 10.1177/070674379303800203.

Abstract

The precedent-setting 1976 US court decision of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California established a "duty to protect" whereby psychotherapists are held responsible to protect the potential victims of their clients' violent behaviour. The purpose of this article is to review and discuss this duty in the context of Canadian law and the 1991 Alberta court decision of Wenden v. Trikha, Royal Alexandra Hospital and Yaltho. The current Canadian interpretation of the duty to protect and guidelines for avoiding such liability are presented.

摘要

1976年美国具有先例意义的塔拉索夫诉加利福尼亚大学董事会案的法庭裁决确立了“保护义务”,据此,心理治疗师有责任保护其客户暴力行为的潜在受害者。本文旨在结合加拿大法律以及1991年艾伯塔省法院对温登诉特里卡、皇家亚历山德拉医院和亚尔托案的裁决来审视和讨论这一义务。文中介绍了加拿大目前对保护义务的解释以及避免此类责任的指导方针。

相似文献

2
Confidentiality after Tarasoff.塔萨夫案后的保密问题。
Health Soc Work. 1994 Aug;19(3):217-22. doi: 10.1093/hsw/19.3.217.
4
Twenty years after Tarasoff: reviewing the duty to protect.塔拉索夫案二十年后:审视保护义务
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1996 Jul-Aug;4(2):67-76. doi: 10.3109/10673229609030526.
10
Tightropes and tragedies: 25 years of Tarasoff.困境与悲剧:塔萨夫事件25年
Med Sci Law. 2003 Jan;43(1):13-22. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.43.1.13.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验