Truscott D, Crook K H
Workers' Compensation Board of Alberta, Rehabilitation Centre, Edmonton.
Can J Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;38(2):84-9. doi: 10.1177/070674379303800203.
The precedent-setting 1976 US court decision of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California established a "duty to protect" whereby psychotherapists are held responsible to protect the potential victims of their clients' violent behaviour. The purpose of this article is to review and discuss this duty in the context of Canadian law and the 1991 Alberta court decision of Wenden v. Trikha, Royal Alexandra Hospital and Yaltho. The current Canadian interpretation of the duty to protect and guidelines for avoiding such liability are presented.
1976年美国具有先例意义的塔拉索夫诉加利福尼亚大学董事会案的法庭裁决确立了“保护义务”,据此,心理治疗师有责任保护其客户暴力行为的潜在受害者。本文旨在结合加拿大法律以及1991年艾伯塔省法院对温登诉特里卡、皇家亚历山德拉医院和亚尔托案的裁决来审视和讨论这一义务。文中介绍了加拿大目前对保护义务的解释以及避免此类责任的指导方针。