• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗椎管狭窄的减压性腰椎椎板切除术。

Decompressive lumbar laminectomy for spinal stenosis.

作者信息

Silvers H R, Lewis P J, Asch H L

机构信息

Southtowns Neurological Surgeons Associates, Buffalo, New York.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 1993 May;78(5):695-701. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.5.0695.

DOI:10.3171/jns.1993.78.5.0695
PMID:8468598
Abstract

A total of 258 consecutive decompressive lumbar laminectomies performed on 244 individuals presenting with spinal stenosis were analyzed retrospectively. Spinal fusion was avoided in all but two patients. Outcome in terms of pain relief and return to normal activity was evaluated in two stages, one derived from patient charts and having a relatively short-term follow-up time (mean 8.4 months) and a second derived from patient responses to a questionnaire (which also scored for satisfaction with the results of surgery), which had a longer follow-up time (mean 4.7 years). More than 20 clinical and operative parameters were analyzed. Overall, a high degree of success (93% pain relief, 95% return to normal activity) was achieved in the short term, which was supported by the longer-term follow-up data (64% pain relief, 56% activity return, 75% satisfaction). The following factors were not significantly correlated with outcome: patient age; sex; worker's compensation or no-fault insurance status; employed versus not employed; a history of back surgery prior to the laminectomy studied; existence of degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis; complete versus incomplete myelographic block; or the level of the lumbar spine undergoing surgery. The major conclusions arising from these data are: 1) for all age groups through at least the eighth decade of life, decompressive lumbar laminectomy is a relatively safe operation having a high medium-to-long-term success rate; 2) lumbar instability following laminectomy is rare, even in individuals presenting prior to surgery with degenerative instability conditions; and 3) lumbar fusion in addition to the decompressive laminectomy procedure is rarely required for degenerative spinal stenosis.

摘要

对244例因脊柱狭窄接受减压性腰椎椎板切除术的患者连续进行的258例手术进行了回顾性分析。除两名患者外,所有患者均未进行脊柱融合术。从疼痛缓解和恢复正常活动两方面对结果进行了两阶段评估,一个阶段的数据来自患者病历,随访时间相对较短(平均8.4个月),另一个阶段的数据来自患者对问卷的回答(问卷也对手术结果满意度进行评分),随访时间较长(平均4.7年)。分析了20多个临床和手术参数。总体而言,短期内取得了高度成功(93%疼痛缓解,95%恢复正常活动),长期随访数据也支持这一结果(64%疼痛缓解,56%恢复活动,75%满意)。以下因素与结果无显著相关性:患者年龄、性别、工伤赔偿或无过失保险状态、就业与否、本次椎板切除术之前的背部手术史、退行性椎体滑脱或脊柱侧弯的存在、脊髓造影完全性或不完全性梗阻,或接受手术的腰椎节段。这些数据得出的主要结论是:1)至少到八十岁的所有年龄组,减压性腰椎椎板切除术是一种相对安全的手术,中长期成功率较高;2)椎板切除术后腰椎不稳很少见,即使是术前存在退行性不稳情况的患者;3)对于退行性脊柱狭窄,除减压性椎板切除术外很少需要进行腰椎融合术。

相似文献

1
Decompressive lumbar laminectomy for spinal stenosis.用于治疗椎管狭窄的减压性腰椎椎板切除术。
J Neurosurg. 1993 May;78(5):695-701. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.5.0695.
2
Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.单节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者双侧减压的双侧与单侧椎板间入路:175例患者术后疼痛、功能障碍及患者满意度的多中心回顾性研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):326-35. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE13994. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
3
Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.退行性腰椎Ⅰ度滑脱减压未融合术后迟发性不稳定的影像学预测因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Apr;18(4):340-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12537. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
4
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症:使用插入旋转式椎间融合器恢复矢状面平衡
Spine J. 2005 Mar-Apr;5(2):170-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.257.
5
Reoperation and revision rates of 3 surgical treatment methods for lumbar stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.腰椎狭窄伴退变性脊柱侧凸和脊椎滑脱 3 种手术治疗方法的再手术和翻修率。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 15;38(26):2287-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000068.
6
Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄减压性椎板切除术的至少10年随访结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jul 15;25(14):1754-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200007150-00003.
7
[Comparison of instrumented posterior fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with low degree lumbar spondylolisthesis].[器械辅助后路融合术与器械辅助腰椎环形融合术治疗轻度腰椎滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的比较]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Apr 15;43(8):486-90.
8
Functional outcome after decompression and instrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: factors influencing unsuccessful outcome change.退行性腰椎管狭窄减压及器械辅助关节融合术后的功能结局:影响不良结局变化的因素
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Dec;94(12):1487-94.
9
Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study.腰椎管狭窄症患者行椎板切除术后的长期随访回顾:一项前瞻性研究。
J Neurosurg. 1998 Jul;89(1):1-7. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.1.0001.
10
Lumbar spinal stenosis: which predictive factors of favorable functional results after decompressive laminectomy?腰椎管狭窄症:减压性椎板切除术后功能预后良好的预测因素有哪些?
Neurochirurgie. 2013 Feb;59(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2012.09.005. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Lumbar arthrodesis in elderly patients, is it a good option? A retrospective analysis of complications and pain improvement in a geriatric hospital.老年患者的腰椎融合术,是一个好的选择吗?一家老年医院并发症及疼痛改善情况的回顾性分析
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08944-4.
2
The Remote Intradural Migration of Polyethylene Glycol-Based Hydrogel Sealant Following Lumbar Laminectomy: A Case Report.腰椎椎板切除术后聚乙二醇基水凝胶密封剂的硬膜内远距离迁移:一例报告
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 22;14(5):1472. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051472.
3
Research Progress on the Posterior Midline Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Approach.
腰椎后正中棘突劈开入路的研究进展
Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(4):990-998. doi: 10.1111/os.14355. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Biportal Endoscopic Decompressive Laminectomy in Octogenarians With Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.双门内镜下减压椎板切除术治疗老年重度腰椎管狭窄症的疗效与安全性
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Nov 8;18(5):482-489. doi: 10.14444/8649.
5
Does Spinal Surgery in Elderly Patients (Over 80 Years-Old) Lead to More Early Post-Operative Complications Than Lower Limb Prosthetic Surgery?80岁以上老年患者的脊柱手术是否比下肢假肢手术导致更多的早期术后并发症?
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2024 Jan 16;10:23337214231225841. doi: 10.1177/23337214231225841. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Assessment of Analgesic Efficacy of Bilateral Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain following Lumbar Laminectomy: A Single-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.评价双侧腰椎竖脊肌平面阻滞对腰椎板切除术术后疼痛的镇痛效果:一项单盲、随机临床试验。
Pain Res Manag. 2023 Dec 28;2023:5813798. doi: 10.1155/2023/5813798. eCollection 2023.
7
Perioperative risk factors related to complications of lumbar spine fusion surgery in elderly patients.老年患者腰椎融合手术并发症的围手术期相关风险因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jul 14;24(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06689-z.
8
Differentiating Lumbar Spinal Etiology from Peripheral Plexopathies.区分腰椎病因与周围神经丛病变。
Biomedicines. 2023 Mar 2;11(3):756. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030756.
9
Neurosurgical Anesthesia: Optimizing Outcomes with Agent Selection.神经外科麻醉:通过药物选择优化治疗效果。
Biomedicines. 2023 Jan 27;11(2):372. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020372.
10
Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery in Depressed Patients: Is it Worth it?抑郁症患者的择期腰椎手术:值得做吗?
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):418-422. doi: 10.14444/8062. Epub 2021 May 7.