• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退行性腰椎Ⅰ度滑脱减压未融合术后迟发性不稳定的影像学预测因素。

Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.

机构信息

Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Apr;18(4):340-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12537. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

DOI:10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12537
PMID:23373567
Abstract

OBJECT

It is not known whether adding fusion to lumbar decompression is necessary for all patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with symptomatic stenosis. Determining specific radiographic traits that might predict delayed instability following decompression surgery might guide clinical decision making regarding the utility of up-front fusion in patients with degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Patients with Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (3-14 mm) with symptomatic stenosis were prospectively enrolled from a single site between May 2002 and September 2009 and treated with decompressive laminectomy without fusion. Patients with mechanical back pain or with gross motion (> 3 mm) on flexion-extension lumbar radiographs were excluded. The baseline radiographic variables measured included amount of slippage, disc height, facet angle, motion at spondylolisthesis (flexion-extension), and sagittal rotation angle. Data were analyzed using multivariate forward selection stepwise logistic regression, chi-square tests, Student t-test, and ANOVA.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled and treated with laminectomy without fusion, and all patients had complete radiographic data sets that were available for analysis. Reoperation was performed in 15 (37.5%) of 40 patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 3.6 years. Reoperation was performed for pain caused by instability at the index level in all 15 cases. Using multivariate stepwise logistic regression with a threshold p value of 0.35, motion at spondylolisthesis, disc height, and facet angle were predictors of reoperation following surgery. Facet angle > 50° was associated with a 39% rate of reoperation, disc height > 6.5 mm was associated with a 45% rate of reoperation, and motion at spondylolisthesis > 1.25 mm was associated with a 54% rate of reoperation. Patients with all 3 risk factors for instability had a 75% rate of reoperation, whereas patients with no risk factors for instability had a 0% rate of reoperation (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with motion at spondylolisthesis > 1.25 mm, disc height > 6.5 mm, and facet angle > 50° are more likely to experience instability following decompression surgery for Grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. Identification of key risk factors for instability might improve patient selection for decompression without fusion surgery.

摘要

目的

对于退行性腰椎滑脱伴症状性狭窄的患者,是否所有接受减压手术的患者都需要融合固定,目前尚不清楚。确定特定的影像学特征,这些特征可能预测减压手术后的迟发性不稳定,这可能有助于指导临床决策,即对于退行性 I 度滑脱的患者,在初次手术时是否使用融合固定。

方法

前瞻性地纳入 2002 年 5 月至 2009 年 9 月期间在一个单中心接受减压手术的 I 度退行性腰椎滑脱(3-14mm)伴症状性狭窄的患者,这些患者接受单纯减压手术,未行融合固定。排除有机械性腰痛或屈伸位腰椎侧位片上有明显活动度(>3mm)的患者。基线影像学变量包括滑脱程度、椎间盘高度、关节突角、滑脱节段屈伸位活动度和矢状面旋转角度。使用多变量向前选择逐步逻辑回归、卡方检验、学生 t 检验和方差分析进行数据分析。

结果

40 例患者接受了单纯减压手术,所有患者均有完整的影像学资料可供分析。40 例患者中有 15 例(37.5%)接受了翻修手术,平均随访时间为 3.6 年。所有翻修病例的手术原因均为失稳引起的疼痛。使用多变量逐步逻辑回归,阈值 p 值为 0.35,滑脱节段活动度、椎间盘高度和关节突角是术后翻修的预测因素。关节突角>50°与 39%的翻修率相关,椎间盘高度>6.5mm 与 45%的翻修率相关,滑脱节段活动度>1.25mm 与 54%的翻修率相关。有 3 个不稳定危险因素的患者翻修率为 75%,而无不稳定危险因素的患者翻修率为 0%(p=0.14)。

结论

对于退行性腰椎滑脱 I 度患者,若减压术后滑脱节段活动度>1.25mm、椎间盘高度>6.5mm 和关节突角>50°,则更容易发生失稳。识别不稳定的关键危险因素可能有助于改善对退行性 I 度滑脱患者减压手术而不融合固定的手术选择。

相似文献

1
Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.退行性腰椎Ⅰ度滑脱减压未融合术后迟发性不稳定的影像学预测因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Apr;18(4):340-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12537. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
2
Increased risk of symptomatic progression of instability following decompression for lumbar canal stenosis in patients receiving chronic glucocorticoids therapy.接受慢性糖皮质激素治疗的患者,腰椎管狭窄减压术后不稳定症状进展风险增加。
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Jan;24(1):14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
Smaller facet effusion in association with restabilization at the time of operation in Japanese patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.在日本退变性腰椎滑脱症患者的手术中,与复位相关的小关节突关节积液。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jan;12(1):88-95. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.SPINE08908.
4
Outcomes in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis more than 5 years after treatment with minimally invasive decompression: examination of pre- and postoperative slippage, intervertebral disc changes, and clinical results.微创减压治疗后5年以上的腰椎退行性椎体滑脱病例的疗效:术前与术后滑脱、椎间盘变化及临床结果的检查
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):367-74. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.SPINE141298. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
5
Noninstrumented facet fusion in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spondylolisthesis.在因退行性腰椎滑脱接受腰椎椎板切除术的患者中进行非器械辅助小关节融合术。
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2010 Fall;19(3):153-8.
6
Preoperative retrolisthesis as a risk factor of postdecompression lumbar disc herniation.术前椎体后移作为减压术后腰椎间盘突出症的一个危险因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Apr;24(4):592-601. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.SPINE15288. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
7
Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.有或无术前椎体滑脱患者行微创腰椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及再次手术率
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Apr;22(4):339-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE13597. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
8
Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.退变性腰椎滑脱并不影响腰椎管狭窄症患者行单侧椎板切开双侧减压术的疗效。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 1;39(5):400-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000161.
9
Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis.腰椎管狭窄症和退行性I度椎体滑脱减压术加或不加器械融合术后的前瞻性疗效评估
J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Oct;1(3):267-72. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.3.0267.
10
Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.除减压外,对伴有退行性腰椎滑脱的腰椎管狭窄症进行动态稳定治疗。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 15;31(4):442-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000200092.49001.6e.

引用本文的文献

1
Bilateral-Contralateral Endoscopic Decompression as a Fusion-Deferral Strategy in Upper Lumbar Stenosis: A Structural Rationale and Conditional Framework-A Technical Note with Cases Review.双侧-对侧内镜减压作为上腰椎管狭窄症融合延迟策略:结构原理与条件框架——附病例回顾的技术说明
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 13;14(16):5726. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165726.
2
A narrative review and scoring proposal for secondary lumbar instability after lumbar decompression surgery.腰椎减压术后继发性腰椎不稳的叙述性综述及评分建议
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Jun 18;167(1):171. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06590-9.
3
Decompression-Only for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis - What are the Risk for Failure? - A Systematic Review.
单纯减压治疗腰椎退变性滑脱症——失败风险有哪些?——一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2025 May 14:21925682251342230. doi: 10.1177/21925682251342230.
4
Surgical and non-surgical management of spondylolisthesis: a comprehensive review.腰椎滑脱症的手术与非手术治疗:一项综述
J Med Life. 2025 Mar;18(3):196-207. doi: 10.25122/jml-2025-0039.
5
Evaluating surgical interventions for low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a network meta-analysis of decompression alone, fusion, and dynamic stabilization.评估低度退行性腰椎滑脱的手术干预措施:单纯减压、融合及动态稳定化的网状Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2025 May;34(5):2002-2014. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08788-y. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
6
Are Randomized Trials Better? Comparison of Baseline Covariate Balance of a Propensity Score-Balanced Lumbar Spine IDE Trial and Comparable RCTs.随机试验更好吗?倾向评分平衡的腰椎器械临床试验与可比随机对照试验的基线协变量平衡比较。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jan 27:21925682251316287. doi: 10.1177/21925682251316287.
7
What Radiographic and Spinopelvic Parameters do Spine Surgeons Consider in Decision-Making for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis?脊柱外科医生在决定治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症时会考虑哪些影像学和脊柱骨盆参数?
Global Spine J. 2024 Dec 4:21925682241306105. doi: 10.1177/21925682241306105.
8
Challenges in Contemporary Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical, Technological, and Patient-Specific Issues.当代脊柱外科的挑战:手术、技术及患者特异性问题的全面综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 14;13(18):5460. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185460.
9
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis in elderly individuals: a matched comparison study.经皮椎间孔内镜减压治疗老年退行性腰椎侧凸伴椎管狭窄的临床疗效:一项匹配对照研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Dec;48(12):3197-3205. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06318-x. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
10
Rate of Reoperation Following Decompression-Only Procedure for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review of Literature.单纯减压手术治疗腰椎退行性椎体滑脱后的再次手术率:文献系统综述
JB JS Open Access. 2024 Jul 5;9(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00163. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.