Gattinoni L, D'Andrea L, Pelosi P, Vitale G, Pesenti A, Fumagalli R
Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Milano, Ospedale S. Gerardo di Monza, Italy.
JAMA. 1993 Apr 28;269(16):2122-7.
To test the hypothesis that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) prevents the collapse of a given lung region when it is equal to or greater than the hydrostatic pressure superimposed (SPL) to that region.
Intervention study with sequential levels of PEEP applied in random order to a cohort of patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Referral center for ARDS in a university hospital.
Ten ARDS patients (with Murray scores > 2.5).
Basal computed tomographic (CT) section taken at 0, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, and 20 cm H2O PEEP.
Basal lung CT sections were divided into 10 equal levels from the ventral to dorsal surfaces. In each level SPL was measured from density and height. The inflation of the level was measured as the gas/tissue ratio (g/t); g/t changes with PEEP were defined as the g/t-P curve. The slope of the g/t-P curve was defined as level compliance (ie, the ratio of change in the g/t of the level to the change in pressure). A linear g/t-P curve was the criterion to detect inflation without recruitment (ie, new pulmonary units opening at a given pressure). A biphasic g/t-P curve (change of compliance after an inflection point) was the criterion to detect recruitment. Pflex was defined as the pressure at which the inflection point occurred.
The SPL increased from level 1 (ventral) to level 10 (dorsal) (r = .91; P < .01). The number of linear g/t-P curves decreased from level 1 to level 10 (r = .98; P < .01), while the number of biphasic g/t-P curves increased (r = .95; P < .01). The Pflex increased from level 1 to 10 (r = .97; P < .01) and Pflex was similar to SPL (Pflex = 1.05 + 0.9 SPL; r = .75; P < .01).
The increased SPL causes compression atelectasis; this is prevented when PEEP to a given lung region is equal to or greater than the SPL.
验证呼气末正压(PEEP)在等于或大于叠加于特定肺区域的流体静压(SPL)时可防止该区域肺萎陷的假说。
对一组成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者按随机顺序依次应用不同水平PEEP的干预性研究。
大学医院的ARDS转诊中心。
10例ARDS患者(默里评分>2.5)。
在0、2、4、5、6、8、10、12、14、15和20 cmH₂O PEEP水平下进行基础计算机断层扫描(CT)。
基础肺CT扫描从腹侧到背侧分为10个等份层面。在每个层面根据密度和高度测量SPL。层面的充气情况以气体/组织比(g/t)衡量;g/t随PEEP的变化定义为g/t-P曲线。g/t-P曲线的斜率定义为层面顺应性(即层面g/t的变化与压力变化的比值)。线性g/t-P曲线是检测无复张(即给定压力下新肺单位开放)时充气情况的确切指标。双相g/t-P曲线(拐点后顺应性变化)是检测复张的确切指标。Pflex定义为拐点出现时的压力。
SPL从第1层面(腹侧)到第10层面(背侧)升高(r = 0.91;P < 0.01)。线性g/t-P曲线数量从第1层面到第10层面减少(r = 0.98;P < 0.01),而双相g/t-P曲线数量增加(r = 0.95;P < 0.01)。Pflex从第1层面到第10层面升高(r = 0.97;P < 0.01),且Pflex与SPL相似(Pflex = 1.05 + 0.9SPL;r = .75;P < 0.01)。
升高的SPL导致压迫性肺不张;当特定肺区域的PEEP等于或大于SPL时可防止这种情况发生。