Lull R J, Littlefield J L
Department of Nuclear Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital Medical Center, CA 94110.
Semin Nucl Med. 1993 Jan;23(1):31-45. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2998(05)80059-5.
Nuclear medicine practice and work force demographics reflect the historically diverse evolution of this specialty. The most pressing problem for nuclear medicine is a projected shortage of fully trained physicians due to practitioner retirement that is unmatched by residency program output. During the past decade the number of 2-year nuclear medicine residency programs (average of 90) and the total number of residents (average of 191 in both years) have remained remarkably stable. In contrast, the number of 1-year nuclear radiology residency programs, available positions, and residents have declined significantly. A similar decline is seen in radiologists obtaining full nuclear medicine training and American Board of Nuclear Medicine (ABNM) board certification. This void has been filled by nonradiologist trainees who only seek certification by ABNM. Perhaps such shifts in resident profile are an early indicator that the United States is evolving toward practice models in which nuclear medicine is provided by fully trained, full-time physicians, similar to the European work force model. The recent Society of Nuclear Medicine survey of 10,446 physicians who practice nuclear medicine shows a current practice pattern in the United States that is distinctly different from that in Europe. The vast majority of those surveyed practice part time. Only 7% of all physicians who practice nuclear medicine do so full time, (ie more than 90% of the time), but they account for as much full-time employee (FTE) work load as 70% of all part-time physicians. Although the number of radiologists entering nuclear medicine is declining, 51% of total FTE work load is still done by radiologists with only American Board of Radiology certification. Physicians certified by ABNM represent 42% of all FTE work load. Cardiologists certified by American Board of Internal Medicine-Cardiovascular Specialization account for approximately 4% of nuclear medicine (15% of total cardiovascular nuclear medicine) FTE work load. Work force shortage of nuclear medicine technologists remains a chronic problem in spite of extensive study: however, recent predictions suggest some improvement in the future. Solutions to work force problems facing nuclear medicine will require ongoing data surveys, aggressive recruitment of trainees, expansion of training positions, and socioeconomic initiatives that promote desirable future practice models.
核医学实践与劳动力人口结构反映了该专业在历史上的多样化发展。核医学面临的最紧迫问题是,由于从业者退休,预计会出现训练有素的医生短缺,而住院医师培训项目的产出无法满足这一缺口。在过去十年中,为期两年的核医学住院医师培训项目数量(平均90个)以及住院医师总数(两年平均均为191人)一直保持显著稳定。相比之下,为期一年的核放射学住院医师培训项目数量、可用职位以及住院医师数量均显著下降。获得完整核医学培训和美国核医学委员会(ABNM)认证的放射科医生数量也出现了类似下降。这一空缺由仅寻求ABNM认证的非放射科受训人员填补。也许住院医师构成的这种变化是一个早期迹象,表明美国正在朝着由训练有素的全职医生提供核医学服务的实践模式发展,类似于欧洲的劳动力模式。核医学协会最近对10446名从事核医学的医生进行的调查显示,美国目前的实践模式与欧洲明显不同。绝大多数接受调查的医生从事兼职工作。从事核医学的所有医生中只有7%全职工作(即超过90%的时间),但他们承担的全职员工(FTE)工作量与所有兼职医生的70%相当。尽管进入核医学领域的放射科医生数量在下降,但51%的总FTE工作量仍由仅拥有美国放射学会认证的放射科医生完成。ABNM认证的医生占所有FTE工作量的42%。美国内科医学委员会心血管专科认证的心脏病专家约占核医学FTE工作量的4%(占心血管核医学总工作量的15%)。尽管进行了广泛研究,但核医学技术人员劳动力短缺仍然是一个长期问题;不过,最近的预测表明未来会有所改善。解决核医学面临的劳动力问题需要持续的数据调查、积极招募受训人员、扩大培训职位以及促进理想未来实践模式的社会经济举措。