Demers C, Henderson P, Blajchman M A, Wells M J, Mitchell L, Johnston M, Ofosu F A, Fernandez-Rachubinski F, Andrew M, Hirsh J
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Thromb Haemost. 1993 Mar 1;69(3):231-5.
To determine whether functional antithrombin III (AT-III) levels measured by a factor Xa inhibition (AT-III-Xa) assay identifies AT-III deficient individuals more reliably than functional AT-III levels measured by a thrombin inhibition (AT-III-IIa) assay.
Cross-sectional study.
Sixty-seven members of a large family with type 2 AT-III deficiency.
DNA analysis was used as the reference diagnostic standard for AT-III status and subjects were classified as AT-III deficient or non deficient according to these results. Functional AT-III levels were measured in all subjects using: 1) a chromogenic substrate for thrombin and added human thrombin (AT-III-IIa), and 2) a chromogenic substrate for factor Xa and added bovine factor Xa (AT-III-Xa). Functional heparin cofactor II (HC-II) levels were measured using a commercially available kit. The proportions of 125I-alpha-thrombin complexed to AT-III and HC-II were measured by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography.
Thirty-one (46%) individuals were classified as AT-III deficient and 36 (54%) as AT-III non deficient. AT-III-Xa assay measured a significantly lower mean AT-III value and a narrower range for individuals classified as AT-III deficient than the AT-III-IIa assay. Using the AT-III-IIa assay, six subjects had borderline AT-III levels compared to none with the AT-III-Xa assay.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
确定通过Xa因子抑制(抗凝血酶III-Xa)试验测定的功能性抗凝血酶III(AT-III)水平,与通过凝血酶抑制(抗凝血酶III-IIa)试验测定的功能性AT-III水平相比,能否更可靠地识别出AT-III缺乏个体。
横断面研究。
一个大型2型AT-III缺乏家族的67名成员。
DNA分析用作AT-III状态的参考诊断标准,根据这些结果将受试者分为AT-III缺乏或非缺乏。使用以下方法测量所有受试者的功能性AT-III水平:1)凝血酶的显色底物并添加人凝血酶(抗凝血酶III-IIa),以及2)Xa因子的显色底物并添加牛Xa因子(抗凝血酶III-Xa)。使用市售试剂盒测量功能性肝素辅因子II(HC-II)水平。通过聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳和放射自显影测量与AT-III和HC-II复合的125I-α-凝血酶的比例。
31名(46%)个体被分类为AT-III缺乏,36名(54%)为AT-III非缺乏。与抗凝血酶III-IIa试验相比,抗凝血酶III-Xa试验测量的AT-III缺乏个体的平均AT-III值显著更低,范围更窄。使用抗凝血酶III-IIa试验时,有6名受试者的AT-III水平处于临界值,而抗凝血酶III-Xa试验则无此情况。(摘要截断于250字)