Suppr超能文献

对未接受产前护理的孕妇在急诊科进行梅毒筛查。

Emergency department screening for syphilis in pregnant women without prenatal care.

作者信息

Ernst A A, Romolo R, Nick T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University, New Orleans.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1993 May;22(5):781-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80791-7.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a high seroprevalence of syphilis in pregnant women without prenatal care presenting to an urban emergency department.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonblinded sampling of pregnant women without prenatal care with a comparison group of pregnant women with prenatal care from the obstetrics clinic. Patients in the ED setting were asked about such associated risk factors as previous syphilis and drug use.

SETTING

Urban ED.

TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS

Pregnant women without prenatal care.

INTERVENTION

Patients were screened for syphilis using the automated reagin test. Reactive automated reagin tests were confirmed by the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption. In addition, 44 patients with nonreactive automated reagin tests had confirmatory tests done. New cases were verified by the state health department.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were included in the study. The average age was 25 years. Eight patients (11.1%) were diagnosed with previously undetected syphilis. Four patients (5.6%) had previously treated syphilis. The laboratory cost of screening was $248 per new case of syphilis detected. The study group was compared with 118 patients matched for age and race who presented to the obstetrics clinic for routine prenatal care. Two new cases of syphilis were discovered in the clinic population (1.7%).

CONCLUSION

A high rate of syphilis infection was detected in this inner-city ED population presenting without prenatal care. This was higher than that found in the patients presenting for obstetrics care in the clinic. Patients can be screened effectively in the ED.

摘要

研究目的

确定在城市急诊科就诊的未接受产前护理的孕妇中梅毒血清阳性率是否较高。

设计

对未接受产前护理的孕妇进行前瞻性、非盲抽样,并与来自产科诊所的接受产前护理的孕妇对照组进行比较。在急诊科询问患者诸如既往梅毒史和药物使用等相关危险因素。

地点

城市急诊科。

参与者类型

未接受产前护理的孕妇。

干预措施

使用自动反应素试验对患者进行梅毒筛查。反应性自动反应素试验通过荧光密螺旋体抗体吸收试验进行确认。此外,对44例自动反应素试验阴性的患者进行了确认试验。新病例由州卫生部门核实。

测量指标及主要结果

72例患者纳入研究。平均年龄为25岁。8例患者(11.1%)被诊断出患有此前未被发现的梅毒。4例患者(5.6%)曾接受过梅毒治疗。每检测到一例新梅毒病例,筛查的实验室成本为248美元。将研究组与118例年龄和种族匹配、到产科诊所进行常规产前护理的患者进行比较。在诊所人群中发现了2例新梅毒病例(1.7%)。

结论

在这个未接受产前护理而到市中心急诊科就诊的人群中检测到梅毒感染率较高。这高于在诊所接受产科护理的患者中的感染率。在急诊科可以有效地对患者进行筛查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验