Suppr超能文献

溶栓药物的耐受性比较概况。综述。

Comparative tolerability profiles of thrombolytic agents. A review.

作者信息

Woo K S, White H D

机构信息

Coronary Care Unit, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 1993 Jan;8(1):19-29. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199308010-00004.

Abstract

The 4 widely available thrombolytic agents, alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, rt-PA), anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC; anistreplase), streptokinase and urokinase have revolutionised the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and are also effective in treating pulmonary embolism and peripheral arterial thrombosis. Therapeutic efficacy of the agents appears to be similar. Choice of a thrombolytic agent depends more on patient characteristics, availability and familiarity with the drug, cost and differences in tolerability. While overall thrombolytic therapy is relatively safe, these 4 agents differ in their tolerability profiles. Streptokinase has the lowest cerebral haemorrhage rate, anistreplase an intermediate and alteplase the highest rate. The incidence of total stroke is also higher with alteplase and anistreplase than with streptokinase, translating to an actual difference in patient risk of 4 extra strokes per 1000 patients treated. Risk of major bleeding is dependent on predisposing factors and seems to be similar with each agent. The incidence of hypotension with alteplase (4.3% in ISIS-3) is less than with streptokinase or anistreplase (6.8 and 7.2%, respectively in ISIS-3). The incidence of major anaphylactic reactions with streptokinase and anistreplase is low (< 1%). Urokinase and alteplase may be preferred for readministration of thrombolytic therapy and anistreplase is the agent of choice where rapid completion of therapy is desirable. The various agents may have different tolerability profiles with different adjunctive therapies and further data are therefore required.

摘要

4种广泛可得的溶栓药物,阿替普酶(重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂,rt-PA)、茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物(APSAC;茴酰纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂)、链激酶和尿激酶,彻底改变了急性心肌梗死的治疗方式,并且在治疗肺栓塞和外周动脉血栓形成方面也很有效。这些药物的治疗效果似乎相似。溶栓药物的选择更多地取决于患者特征、可用性、对药物的熟悉程度、成本以及耐受性差异。虽然总体溶栓治疗相对安全,但这4种药物在耐受性方面存在差异。链激酶的脑出血发生率最低,茴香酰纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂居中,阿替普酶最高。阿替普酶和茴香酰纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂导致的总卒中发生率也高于链激酶,这意味着每1000例接受治疗的患者实际发生额外卒中的风险相差4例。严重出血风险取决于诱发因素,并且每种药物的风险似乎相似。阿替普酶导致低血压的发生率(ISIS-3研究中为4.3%)低于链激酶或茴香酰纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂(ISIS-3研究中分别为6.8%和7.2%)。链激酶和茴香酰纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂发生严重过敏反应的发生率较低(<1%)。再次进行溶栓治疗时,尿激酶和阿替普酶可能更受青睐,而在希望快速完成治疗的情况下,茴香酰纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂是首选药物。不同药物与不同辅助治疗联合使用时,耐受性可能不同,因此需要更多数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验