Gretler D D, Carlson G F, Montano A V, Murphy M B
Committee on Clinical Pharmacology, University of Chicago, Illinois.
Am J Hypertens. 1993 Feb;6(2):127-33. doi: 10.1093/ajh/6.2.127.
In order for 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) to be useful in clinical decision making, it is necessary to quantify ambient physical activity and to develop appropriate norms of ambulatory pressure for different levels of activity. The present study has compared the predictive value of physical activity determined by an electronic activity monitor or a written diary, for concomitantly recorded blood pressure during ABPM in healthy normotensive subjects. Each subject wore four activity monitors, on the right and left wrists, on the left ankle and at the waist, respectively. Linear regression analysis was performed for each subject to determine the correlation between ABPM data (systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate) and activity data (obtained from diaries and the four monitors). Significant differences in the degree of correlation were found for both the location of the activity monitor and the time (1/2, 2, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min preceding blood pressure measurement) over which activity was averaged (P < .05 by two-way analysis of variance). The best correlation was obtained with the activity monitor worn on the dominant wrist, and when activity was averaged over 2 to 10 min preceding blood pressure determination, accounting for 18 to 69% (mean 36 +/- 5%) of systolic blood pressure variation. Diaries performed similarly in these well-motivated subjects. It is concluded that because of the significant interaction between activity and blood pressure, ABPM data should be interpreted only in the light of concomitant activity data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为了使24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)在临床决策中发挥作用,有必要对环境体力活动进行量化,并针对不同活动水平制定合适的动态血压标准。本研究比较了通过电子活动监测器或书面日记确定的体力活动,对健康血压正常受试者在ABPM期间同步记录的血压的预测价值。每位受试者分别在右手腕、左手腕、左脚踝和腰部佩戴四个活动监测器。对每位受试者进行线性回归分析,以确定ABPM数据(收缩压、舒张压和心率)与活动数据(从日记和四个监测器获得)之间的相关性。发现活动监测器的位置以及平均活动时间(血压测量前1/2、2、5、10、15和30分钟)的相关性程度存在显著差异(双向方差分析,P<0.05)。佩戴在优势手腕上的活动监测器,以及在血压测定前2至10分钟对活动进行平均时,相关性最佳,占收缩压变化的18%至69%(平均36±5%)。在这些积极性高的受试者中,日记的表现类似。得出的结论是,由于活动与血压之间存在显著相互作用,ABPM数据应仅根据同步的活动数据进行解释。(摘要截短为250字)