Suppr超能文献

总活动椭圆形精子计数在解释仓鼠卵精子穿透试验中的重要性。

Importance of total motile oval count in interpreting the hamster ovum sperm penetration assay.

作者信息

Brandeis V T

机构信息

Brandeis Fertility Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Androl. 1993 Jan-Feb;14(1):53-9.

PMID:8473237
Abstract

A prospective study relating computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) and technician-determined morphology to sperm penetration assay (SPA) outcome in patients with unexplained infertility or male factor was undertaken on 190 males aged 28-45 to determine the value of total motile oval count (TMO), compared to concentration, motility, and morphology considered independently, in predicting the outcome of the SPA. Prewash sperm count ranged 20-1,328 x 10(6), motility 0-93%, morphology 25-78% oval (%OVAL), and SPA scores 0-100%. Multiple regression analysis yielded two statistical models that identified significant predictors for % penetration (%P). Only TMO in one model and %OVAL in an independent effects model showed statistically significant correlation (P < 0.0001) to %P for all subjects. Discriminant function analysis showed the TMO model 85.4% accurate in classifying %P both in the abnormal range (< 20%P) and in the normal range (> or = 20%P). The independent effects model correctly classified 93% in the abnormal group, but projected 72 false negatives in the 101 subjects with %P > or = 20%, correctly classifying only 28.7%. Relative risk analysis showed TMO as a stronger risk factor affecting SPA outcome than %OVAL. It is concluded from this study that below 20%P, both TMO and %OVAL appeared to be comparable as predictive factors. Additionally, the TMO model was equally predictive for SPA > or = 20%P, where the independent effects model showed only 28.7% accuracy. SPA outcome appeared to be more profoundly affected by a decrease in TMO than by a decrease in %OVAL alone.

摘要

对190名年龄在28 - 45岁、患有不明原因不孕症或男性因素不孕症的男性进行了一项前瞻性研究,该研究将计算机辅助精液分析(CASA)和技术人员确定的形态学与精子穿透试验(SPA)结果相关联,以确定总活动椭圆形精子数(TMO)相较于单独考虑的浓度、活力和形态学在预测SPA结果方面的价值。洗前精子计数范围为20 - 1328×10⁶,活力为0 - 93%,形态学为25 - 78%椭圆形(%OVAL),SPA评分为0 - 100%。多元回归分析得出两个统计模型,确定了%穿透率(%P)的显著预测因素。在一个模型中只有TMO,在一个独立效应模型中只有%OVAL与所有受试者的%P显示出统计学显著相关性(P < 0.0001)。判别函数分析表明,TMO模型在将%P分类为异常范围(< 20%P)和正常范围(≥ 20%P)方面的准确率为85.4%。独立效应模型在异常组中正确分类率为93%,但在101名%P≥ 20%的受试者中预测出72例假阴性,正确分类率仅为28.7%。相对风险分析表明,TMO是比%OVAL更强的影响SPA结果的风险因素。从这项研究得出的结论是,在%P低于20%时,TMO和%OVAL作为预测因素似乎相当。此外,对于SPA≥ 20%P,TMO模型的预测能力相同,而独立效应模型的准确率仅为28.7%。SPA结果似乎受TMO降低的影响比仅受%OVAL降低的影响更大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验