Darkes J, Goldman M S
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa 33620-8200.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Apr;61(2):344-53. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.2.344.
Substantial correlational evidence supports a causal (mediational) interpretation of alcohol expectancy operation, but definitive support requires a true experimental test. Thus, moderately to heavily drinking male college students were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions in a pre-post design: Expectancy challenge (designed to manipulate expectancy levels), "traditional" information, and assessment-only control. Expectancy challenge produced significant drinking decreases, compared with the other 2 groups. Decreases in measured expectancies paralleled drinking decreases in the challenge condition. Significant increases in alcohol knowledge in the traditional program were not associated with decreased drinking. These experimental findings support a causal (mediational) interpretation of expectancy operation. The implications for a cognitive (memory) model of expectancies and for prevention and intervention programs for problem drinking and alcoholism are discussed.
大量的相关证据支持对酒精预期作用的因果(中介)解释,但确凿的支持需要进行真正的实验测试。因此,在一项前后测设计中,将中度至重度饮酒的男性大学生随机分配到三种条件中的一种:预期挑战(旨在操纵预期水平)、“传统”信息和仅作评估的对照组。与其他两组相比,预期挑战导致饮酒量显著减少。在挑战条件下,测得的预期降低与饮酒量减少相平行。传统项目中酒精知识的显著增加与饮酒量减少无关。这些实验结果支持对预期作用的因果(中介)解释。文中还讨论了对预期的认知(记忆)模型以及对问题饮酒和酒精中毒的预防与干预项目的启示。