Wasyliw O E, Haywood T W, Grossman L S, Cavanaugh J L
Rush Medical College.
J Pers Assess. 1993 Apr;60(2):252-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_4.
Although the MacAndrew Alcoholism scale is the most widely used Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) measure of vulnerability to alcohol abuse, its accuracy has not been studied in patients intrinsically motivated to exaggerate or minimize psychopathology. We examined the usefulness of the MAC in predicting alcohol abuse in a forensic clinical sample. Results indicate the MAC (a) was not more effective than direct inquiry in this group, (b) scores were correlated negatively with minimization and positively with exaggeration for subjects with histories of alcohol abuse, (c) offered advantages over direct inquiry both in screening for alcohol history (sensitivity) and in confirming it (specificity), and (d) scores were only moderately more accurate in valid than in minimized or exaggerated MMPI protocols. The results suggest that clinicians should use the MAC cautiously, particularly when they suspect motivation to minimize psychopathology.
尽管麦克安德鲁酒精中毒量表是明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)中使用最广泛的衡量酒精滥用易感性的指标,但其在那些有内在动机夸大或淡化精神病理学表现的患者中的准确性尚未得到研究。我们在一个法医临床样本中检验了该量表在预测酒精滥用方面的效用。结果表明,该量表(a)在这组人群中并不比直接询问更有效;(b)对于有酒精滥用史的受试者,其得分与淡化呈负相关,与夸大呈正相关;(c)在筛查饮酒史(敏感性)和确认饮酒史(特异性)方面比直接询问更具优势;(d)在有效MMPI协议中,其得分的准确性仅比淡化或夸大的协议稍高一些。结果表明,临床医生应谨慎使用该量表,尤其是当他们怀疑患者有淡化精神病理学表现的动机时。