• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性和女性之间有什么差异?来自面部测量的证据。

What's the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement.

作者信息

Burton A M, Bruce V, Dench N

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Perception. 1993;22(2):153-76. doi: 10.1068/p220153.

DOI:10.1068/p220153
PMID:8474841
Abstract

Human subjects are able to identify the sex of faces with very high accuracy. Using photographs of adults in which hair was concealed by a swimming cap, subjects performed with 96% accuracy. Previous work has identified a number of dimensions on which the faces of men and women differ. An attempt to combine these dimensions into a single function to classify male and female faces reliably is described. Photographs were taken of 91 male and 88 female faces in full face and profile. These were measured in several ways: (i) simple distances between key points in the pictures; (ii) ratios and angles formed between key points in the pictures; (iii) three-dimensional (3-D) distances derived by combination of full-face and profile photographs. Discriminant function analysis showed that the best discriminators were derived from simple distance measurements in the full face (85% accuracy with 12 variables) and 3-D distances (85% accuracy with 6 variables). Combining measures taken from the picture plane with those derived in 3-D produced a discriminator approaching human performance (94% accuracy with 16 variables). Performance of the discriminant function was compared with that of human perceivers and found to be correlated, but far from perfectly. The difficulty of deriving a reliable function to distinguish between the sexes is discussed with reference to the development of automatic face-processing programs in machine vision. It is argued that such systems will need to incorporate an understanding of the stimuli if they are to be effective.

摘要

人类受试者能够非常准确地识别面部的性别。使用成年人的照片,照片中头发被泳帽遮住,受试者的识别准确率达到了96%。先前的研究已经确定了男性和女性面部存在差异的多个维度。本文描述了一种将这些维度组合成一个单一函数以可靠地对面部进行性别分类的尝试。拍摄了91张男性面部和88张女性面部的正面和侧面照片。这些照片通过几种方式进行测量:(i)图片中关键点之间的简单距离;(ii)图片中关键点之间形成的比例和角度;(iii)通过正面和侧面照片组合得出的三维(3-D)距离。判别函数分析表明,最佳判别指标来自正面的简单距离测量(12个变量时准确率为85%)和三维距离(6个变量时准确率为85%)。将从图像平面获取的测量值与三维测量值相结合,得到了一个接近人类表现的判别指标(16个变量时准确率为94%)。将判别函数的表现与人类感知者的表现进行了比较,发现两者存在相关性,但远非完美相关。文中结合机器视觉中自动面部处理程序的发展,讨论了推导可靠的性别区分函数的困难。有人认为,这样的系统如果要有效,就需要纳入对刺激的理解。

相似文献

1
What's the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement.男性和女性之间有什么差异?来自面部测量的证据。
Perception. 1993;22(2):153-76. doi: 10.1068/p220153.
2
Sex discrimination: how do we tell the difference between male and female faces?性别歧视:我们如何区分男性和女性的面孔?
Perception. 1993;22(2):131-52. doi: 10.1068/p220131.
3
How accurately do young children and adults discriminate the gender of natural faces?幼儿和成年人辨别自然面孔性别的准确性如何?
Percept Mot Skills. 2006 Jun;102(3):654-64. doi: 10.2466/pms.102.3.654-664.
4
Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception.面部决策的电生理相关性:来自正立和倒置穆尼脸感知的见解。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):663-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.03.017.
5
Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces.面部后效应表明,男性和女性面孔的编码是可分离的,但并非截然不同。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Feb;34(1):101-12. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.101.
6
Effect of depth of processing on recognition memory for normal and inverted photographs of faces.
Percept Mot Skills. 1985 Apr;60(2):503-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1985.60.2.503.
7
Learning faces from photographs.从照片中学习面部知识。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Feb;34(1):77-100. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.77.
8
Neural activation during anticipation of opposite-sex and same-sex faces in heterosexual men and women.异性恋男性和女性在预期异性和同性面孔出现时的神经激活情况。
Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 1;66:223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.068. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
9
ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: Disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception.人类大脑中面部分类速度的事件相关电位证据:区分低级视觉线索对面部感知的贡献。
Vision Res. 2011 Jun 21;51(12):1297-311. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
10
Recognising facial surfaces.
Perception. 1991;20(6):755-69. doi: 10.1068/p200755.

引用本文的文献

1
Facial basis of stereotypes: Judgements of warmth and competence based on cross-group typicality/distinctiveness of faces.刻板印象的面部基础:基于跨群体面部典型性/独特性的温暖与能力判断。
Br J Psychol. 2025 Feb;116(1):269-286. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12738. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Sexual Dimorphism: The Interrelation of Shape and Color.性二态性:形状和颜色的相互关系。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Aug;53(8):3255-3265. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02918-1. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Feminization of the Forehead: A Scoping Literature Review and Cohort Study of Transfeminine Patients.
额部女性化:跨性别女性患者的文献综述和队列研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Sep;48(18):3577-3588. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04143-6. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Distinct patterns of neural response to faces from different races in humans and deep networks.人类和深度网络对面孔的不同种族的神经反应存在明显差异。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Nov 4;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad059.
5
Horses cross-modally recognize women and men.马能跨模态识别女性和男性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 8;13(1):3864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30830-6.
6
Children perceive illusory faces in objects as male more often than female.儿童更经常将物体中的错觉面孔视为男性,而不是女性。
Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105398. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105398. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
7
DeepSmile: Anomaly Detection Software for Facial Movement Assessment.深度微笑:用于面部运动评估的异常检测软件。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 10;13(2):254. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020254.
8
The role of discriminability in face perception: Interference processing of expression, gender, and gaze.面部知觉中可辨别性的作用:表情、性别和注视的干扰处理。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Oct;84(7):2281-2292. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02561-9. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
9
Illusory faces are more likely to be perceived as male than female.错觉面孔更有可能被视为男性,而不是女性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 1;119(5). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117413119.
10
How facial aging affects perceived gender: Insights from maximum likelihood conjoint measurement.面部衰老如何影响性别认知:最大似然联合测量的见解。
J Vis. 2021 Nov 1;21(12):12. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.12.12.